[DCRB-L] Repeatability of printing information
John Attig
jxa16 at psulias.psu.edu
Mon Jun 2 10:11:57 MDT 2003
At the DCRM Conference, it was indicated that field 260 subfields $e, f, g
(Place of printing, name of printer, date of printing) would need to be
made repeatable in order to accommodate nineteenth-century books. I
volunteered to draft a MARC format revision proposal.
Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any examples that would require
repeating these subfields, either in DCRB or in ISBD(A). If anybody has
any such examples, I would be delighted to have them.
John Attig
Cataloging Services
Penn State University Libraries
jxa16 at psulias.psu.edu
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list