<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6249.1">
<TITLE>Colored illustrations</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Georgia">I read John's proposal with appropriate amounts of amusement and seriousness. However, I do think we need a definition of "colored," because otherwise illustrations printed in one color on a tinted paper would be described by some as colored, which I don't think we want. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Georgia">What if we were to specify that a colored illustration is one that is printed in at least two different colors of ink? It's easy to understand, and I believe that is the original intent of the clumsy wording. And the RBMS logo would qualify as colored.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT COLOR="#000000" FACE="Georgia">This does not consider the case of hand-coloring, however, and I have some issues with WG3 recommendations regarding that, which I will post in due time.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Baskerville Win95BT">___________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Baskerville Win95BT">Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. </FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">Head of Cataloging</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">Folger Shakespeare Library</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">201 East Capitol St., S.E.</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">Washington, D.C. 20003</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">202.675-0369 (p)</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">202.675-0328 (f)</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">djleslie@folger.edu</FONT>
<BR><A HREF="file://www.folger.edu"><U></U><U><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Calisto MT">www.folger.edu</FONT></U></A>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>