<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD><TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=914223817-15072005><FONT color=#000080>Right; I understood her
announcement for what it was. However, RDA LCRI's they will presumably need to
be written from scratch, which does invite alternative considerations.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'">________________________<o:p></o:p></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoAutoSig><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'">Deborah J.
Leslie<BR></SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'">Folger
Library<BR></SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'"><A
href="mailto:djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</A><BR></SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
dcrm-l-admin@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-admin@lib.byu.edu] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>Robert Maxwell<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, 15 July, 2005 13:27<BR><B>To:</B>
dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [DCRM-L] Proposed response on
21.27<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375152317-15072005><FONT face=Arial>On the question of LCRIs
for RDA, Barbara Tillett backtracked at the last CC:DA meeting, saying that
people had misunderstood--what they really meant when they said that there
would be no LCRIs was that there would no longer be any LCRIs for AACR, but
that there would indeed be some sort of LC interpretations for RDA. I was
skeptical of the initial announcement (or rumor, or whatever) that there
wouldn't be any more LCRIs; it looks as though there will be. At least
according to the latest pronouncement.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375152317-15072005><FONT
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=375152317-15072005><FONT face=Arial>Bob</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P>Robert L. Maxwell<BR>Special Collections and Ancient Languages Catalog
Librarian<BR>Genre/Form Authorities Librarian<BR>6728 Harold B. Lee
Library<BR>Brigham Young University<BR>Provo, UT 84602<BR>(801)422-5568 </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> dcrm-l-admin@lib.byu.edu
[mailto:dcrm-l-admin@lib.byu.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Deborah J.
Leslie<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 15, 2005 8:54 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [DCRM-L] Proposed response on
21.27<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT color=#000080>Dear colleagues,
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT
color=#000080></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT color=#000080>Relaxed and tanned
and back from holiday in Glamorous Central California, I come to this
discussion late. The DCRM-L discussion as well as Bob's response has
been <EM>wonderfully</EM> instructive. I've cataloged a number of these in
the past, but never really knew what was going on. Many
thanks!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT
color=#000080></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT color=#000080>I do want to respond
to the comments about including specialist rules in DCRM. I agree that we
should not have specialist rules for entry in DCRM; however, it makes sense
to me that specialist interpretations on general rules would be appropriate.
Right now we depend a fair bit on the LCRI's to make appropriate headings
for early names. With the arrival of RDA, those RI's will disappear.
More will be written, no doubt; nevertheless, why not have DCRM provide
interpretation to situations common to early materials but not to more
general collections? Keeping in mind that DCRM(B) is an LC publication, they
will need to agree on the text, so perhaps it can be considered as LCRI's
for rare materials. Something worth thinking about, anyway.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT color=#000080>This is
<STRONG><EM>not</EM></STRONG> to say that I think the disputation rule
should not be in RDA. It most certainly should.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT
color=#000080></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT color=#000080>I'd be interested in
knowing if there is any more recent published work on academic disputations.
I can't do it myself, but would be grateful for a volunteer to do a
literature search.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005><FONT
color=#000080></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=424244514-15072005>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal align=left><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Palatino Linotype'">_________________________________<BR>Deborah
J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.<BR>Head of Cataloging<BR>Folger Shakespeare
Library<BR><A
href="mailto:djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</A><BR>http://www.folger.edu<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>