<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>RE: [DCRM-L] relator terms as part of a name/title heading</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Deborah--<BR>
<BR>
Unless I misunderstand you, the whole point of a relator term is to distinguish that person as an editor, publisher, printer, etc. I would leave them in place so that someone searching for "Jones, John, \e printer" can access all such separately from "Jones, John".<BR>
<BR>
Dan Rettberg<BR>
Rare Book and Manuscript Bibliographer<BR>
Klau Library<BR>
Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion<BR>
Cincinnati, Ohio<BR>
<BR>
drettberg@huc.edu<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu on behalf of Deborah J. Leslie<BR>
Sent: Tue 11/6/2007 5:02 PM<BR>
To: DCRM Revision Group List<BR>
Cc: MSS Catalogers<BR>
Subject: [DCRM-L] relator terms as part of a name/title heading<BR>
<BR>
At the Folger, we're using relator terms with 100 main entry headings for our manuscripts. So what happens when we want to link to the heading for that work in another record? Do we retain the ?e?<BR>
<BR>
My inclination is to say no, but then that creates a discrepancy between the heading for a work as it appears on the record for the work itself and as it appears linked from other records.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Deborah<BR>
<BR>
__________________________<BR>
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.<BR>
Head of Cataloging<BR>
Folger Shakespeare Library<BR>
201 East Capitol St., S.E.<BR>
Washington, D.C. 20003<BR>
202.675-0369<BR>
djleslie@folger.edu | <A HREF="http://www.folger.edu">http://www.folger.edu</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>