<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16525" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=250170915-07112007>Thanks, Dan. Your response, in addition to a
private message, makes me think I haven't been clear enough. I'm not talking
about putting an added entry for a person on another record, but rather
making an added entry to a <EM>work</EM>. </SPAN><SPAN
class=250170915-07112007>It might be a 773 linking entry for host items, or may
simply be a 700 related work name/title. Or even a 600 name/title subject
heading. </DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Perhaps another way of thinking about it is how would we create a name/title
authority record for a particular work for which we've entered under an author
with a relator term. When I think about it that way, it seems obvious to me that
the relator term, which in fact is not part of the person's heading, should drop
off. But imagine that our opacs really worked properly and collocated works
according to their work headings (by which I mean the main entry plus title, or
uniform title main entry). This discrepancy between the way the person appeared
on the main work and how he appeared in a name/title added entry would prevent
appropriate collocation. </P></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face="Palatino Linotype"
size=2>____________________________</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT
face="Palatino Linotype" size=2>Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" size=2>Head of
Cataloging</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT face="Palatino Linotype"
size=2>Folger Shakespeare Library</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN lang=en-us><FONT
face="Palatino Linotype" size=2>djleslie@folger.edu</FONT></SPAN> <BR><SPAN
lang=en-us><FONT face="Palatino Linotype" size=2><A
href="http://www.folger.edu/">http://www.folger.edu</A></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Rettberg, Dan
[mailto:drettberg@huc.edu] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, 07 November, 2007
10:00<BR><B>To:</B> DCRM Revision Group List; DCRM Revision Group
List<BR><B>Cc:</B> MSS Catalogers<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [DCRM-L] relator
terms as part of a name/title heading<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT size=2>Deborah--<BR><BR>Unless I misunderstand you, the whole point
of a relator term is to distinguish that person as an editor, publisher,
printer, etc. I would leave them in place so that someone searching for
"Jones, John, \e printer" can access all such separately from "Jones,
John".<BR><BR>Dan Rettberg<BR>Rare Book and Manuscript Bibliographer<BR>Klau
Library<BR>Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion<BR>Cincinnati,
Ohio<BR><BR>drettberg@huc.edu<BR><BR><BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu on behalf of Deborah J.
Leslie<BR>Sent: Tue 11/6/2007 5:02 PM<BR>To: DCRM Revision Group List<BR>Cc:
MSS Catalogers<BR>Subject: [DCRM-L] relator terms as part of a name/title
heading<BR><BR>At the Folger, we're using relator terms with 100 main entry
headings for our manuscripts. So what happens when we want to link to the
heading for that work in another record? Do we retain the ?e?<BR><BR>My
inclination is to say no, but then that creates a discrepancy between the
heading for a work as it appears on the record for the work itself and as it
appears linked from other
records.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Deborah<BR><BR>__________________________<BR>Deborah
J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.<BR>Head of Cataloging<BR>Folger Shakespeare
Library<BR>201 East Capitol St., S.E.<BR>Washington, D.C.
20003<BR>202.675-0369<BR>djleslie@folger.edu | <A
href="http://www.folger.edu">http://www.folger.edu</A><BR><BR><BR><BR></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>