I noticed in example 45 of _Examples to Accompany Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Books_ (2nd ed.) that wove papers are not considered a local note or local genre/form term (there is no $5 [INSTITUTION CODE] following the 500 or 655). Do you treat wove papers as common to most copies? Is the assumption that printers worked from large piles of paper, probably from the same stock? Does the date of printing impact your decision? Items I have date from the 1790s to 1810, fairly early in wove paper's general use.<br>
<br>And would that approach also apply to colored papers? I have a 1796 English pamphlet printed on blue paper. I don't know enough about the use of colored papers but I imagine work flow and time constraints would cause most of the copies to be printed on blue paper, thus making it a non-local note and non-local genre/form term?<br>
<br>Thanks for your help,<br><br>Kate<br><br><br>-- <br>Kate S. Moriarty, MSW, MLS | Rare Book Catalog Librarian | Pius XII Memorial Library | <br>Saint Louis University | 3650 Lindell Blvd . | St. Louis, MO 63108 | (314) 977-3098 (tel) | (314) 977-3108 (fax) | <a href="mailto:moriarks@slu.edu">moriarks@slu.edu</a> | <a href="http://libraries.slu.edu/">http://libraries.slu.edu/</a><br>