<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16809" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Kate</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>I would assume (for all the reasons you just gave) that
wove paper is not a local note. I see a lot of blue paper. I don't think you
should consider that local either. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Have you tried searching in OCLC to see how other libraries
are handling these type of evidentiary tracings?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=662220401-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Nina</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu
[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Kate
Moriarty<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 23, 2009 4:28 PM<BR><B>To:</B> DCRM
Revision Group List<BR><B>Subject:</B> [DCRM-L] Wove papers: local note or
not?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>I noticed in example 45 of _Examples to Accompany Descriptive
Cataloging of Rare Books_ (2nd ed.) that wove papers are not considered a local
note or local genre/form term (there is no $5 [INSTITUTION CODE] following the
500 or 655). Do you treat wove papers as common to most copies? Is the
assumption that printers worked from large piles of paper, probably from the
same stock? Does the date of printing impact your decision? Items I have date
from the 1790s to 1810, fairly early in wove paper's general use.<BR><BR>And
would that approach also apply to colored papers? I have a 1796 English pamphlet
printed on blue paper. I don't know enough about the use of colored papers but I
imagine work flow and time constraints would cause most of the copies to be
printed on blue paper, thus making it a non-local note and non-local genre/form
term?<BR><BR>Thanks for your help,<BR><BR>Kate<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Kate S.
Moriarty, MSW, MLS | Rare Book Catalog Librarian | Pius
XII Memorial Library | <BR>Saint Louis University | 3650
Lindell Blvd . | St. Louis, MO 63108 | (314) 977-3098 (tel)
| (314) 977-3108 (fax) | <A
href="mailto:moriarks@slu.edu">moriarks@slu.edu</A> | <A
href="http://libraries.slu.edu/">http://libraries.slu.edu/</A><BR></BODY></HTML>