<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rtc="http://microsoft.com/officenet/conferencing" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:Repl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/" xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ppda="http://www.passport.com/NameSpace.xsd" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<title>Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.MsoAutoSig, li.MsoAutoSig, div.MsoAutoSig
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"E-mail Signature Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.E-mailSignatureChar
{mso-style-name:"E-mail Signature Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"E-mail Signature";
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:blue;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>And is invective always prejudged? <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>There is something to calling it “Controversial
literature,” since all of these NT’s but one are anti- something .
The only problem is that “controversial” in general usage
doesn’t necessarily mean “against.” Also, keep in mind that this
is not a genre term but a gathering term; one would still be applying an NT, so
we only need a term that’s accurate and non-derogatory. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th110.htm">Anti-Catholic
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th112.htm">Anti-clerical
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th113.htm">Anti-communist
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th114.htm">Anti-homosexual
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th115.htm">Anti-immigrant
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th116.htm">Anti-Masonic
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th117.htm">Anti-Semitic
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th601.htm">White
supremacist literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. <a
href="http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/genre/th602.htm">Xenophobic
literature</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>. SN:
Use for works which exhibit fear, dislike or hatred of <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'>.
foreigners, foreign customs, etc.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Sara
Piasecki<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, 19 June, 2009 13:50<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Is prejudice always unreasoned? I think we may be confusing this
with invective. There are some remarkably reasoned pieces of “literature
of prejudice” out there. I think that “polemical” in some
ways addresses this broad spectrum of tone in hate literature.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Sara<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Sara J. Piasecki, Head, Historical Collections & Archives <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Oregon Health & Science University Library<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Mailcode LIB<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Portland, OR 97239-3098<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>503-418-2287 (phone) | 503-418-0235 (fax)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>piasecki@ohsu.edu<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>http://www.ohsu.edu/library/hom/ | http://ohsu-hca.blogspot.com/<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Eduardo
Tenenbaum<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 19, 2009 10:29 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'DCRM Revision Group List'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I think we are doing ourselves a disservice by not making a
clear distinction between “prejudice” and
“polemic.” The two are clearly different. Our thesaurus has
NTs under “Literature of prejudice” that could easily belong under
“Polemical literature”, for example
“Anti-clerical.” The distinction between
“prejuduce” and “polemic” is between unreasoned
opinion/hostility and reasoned argument (however strongly worded).<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>From the OED:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>prejudice, <i>n.</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b>I.</b> Prejudgement.<a name=50187167def2></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <a name=50187167-mI.1.a></a><b>1. a.</b>
Preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience; bias,
partiality; (now) <i>spec.</i> unreasoned dislike, hostility, or antagonism
towards, or discrimination against, a race, sex, or other class of people.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>------------------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>hate, <i>n.</i><sup>1</sup><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <a name=50103052-m1.a></a><b>1. a.</b> An emotion of
extreme dislike or aversion; detestation, abhorrence, hatred. Now chiefly <i>poet.<o:p></o:p></i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <a name=50103052-m1.b></a><b>b.</b> The object of
hatred. <i>poetic</i>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><a name=50103052-m2.b></a><b>2. b.</b> Used <i>attrib.</i>
or as quasi-<i>adj.</i>: designed to stir up hate, e.g. <a name=50103052se7></a><b><i>hate
campaign</i></b>; marked or characterized by hate; <a name=50103052se8></a><b>hate
mail</b>, letters (often anonymous) in which the senders express their
hostility towards the recipient.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>DRAFT ADDITIONS JUNE 2002 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><a name=50103052def7></a> <b>hate</b>,
<i>n.</i><sup>1</sup><a name=50103052def8></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <b><img border=0 width=9 height=8
id="_x0000_i1028" src="cid:image001.gif@01C9F0FB.DCED8160" alt="*"></b> <a
name=50103052se9></a><b>hate crime</b> <i>n.</i> orig. <i>U.S.</i> a crime,
usually violent, motivated by hatred or intolerance of another social group,
esp. on the basis of race or sexuality; crime of this type; freq. <i>attrib.</i>
(occas. in <i>pl.</i>), designating legislation, etc., framed to address such
crime.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>---------------------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>polemic, <i>adj. </i>and<i> n.</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b>A.</b> <i>adj.</i><a name=50182751def2></a> Of
the nature of, exhibiting, given to, or relating to dispute or controversy;
contentious, disputatious, combative<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b>B.</b> <i>n.</i><a name=50182751def4></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <a name=50182751-mB.1></a><b>1.</b>
A controversial argument; a strong verbal or written attack on a person,
opinion, doctrine, etc.; (as a mass noun) writing or opinion of this kind.
Also: (in <i>sing.</i> and <i>pl.</i>) aggressive debate or controversy; the
practice of engaging in such debate.<a name=50182751n1></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Schneider,
Nina<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 19, 2009 12:57 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>I've been searching LCSH for some ideas. There's a subject heading
"Attitudes (Psychology)" in LCSH. There are also variations on
"opinions." If we feel it's necessary to change the genre term, we
may want to look at these. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Nina</span> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>+-------<br>
Nina Schneider<br>
Head Cataloger<br>
William Andrews Clark Memorial Library<br>
2520 Cimarron Street<br>
Los Angeles, CA 90018<br>
<br>
323-731-8529<br>
nschneider@humnet.ucla.edu</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu
[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Holly Phelps<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 19, 2009 8:19 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'>Interesting discussion. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'>I use the NTs but not the broader term. Does anyone? Would it be
useful to remove the term from the list, and just use something (Controversial
literature?) in brackets under [Content of work] - [Political works] in the
hierarchical list? I’d like to see the NTs stay grouped somehow.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoAutoSig><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'>H.A. Phelps<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoPlainText><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black'>hphelps@librarycompany.org<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dooley,Jackie<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 19, 2009 11:16 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Yes, I get it. My point is that it’s
so soft as to be relatively meaningless. How about “hate
literature”? :) After all, our society calls them “hate
groups,” not “polemical groups.” Good literary warrant.<br>
<br>
On 6/19/09 7:39 AM, "Deborah Leslie" <<a href="djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</a>>
wrote:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>One of the things that came
up in conversation was that we knew it when we saw it, but couldn’t find
a non-derogatory name for it. “Polemical” isn’t necessarily
derogatory, while “Prejudice” is. <br>
</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'><br>
</span><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <a
href="dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> [<a
href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Dooley,Jackie<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, 19 June, 2009 10:29<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical<br>
</span><br>
<span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Strikes me as
equally subjective—not to mention vague, since it could include stuff
with a much softer point of view than e.g. a John Birch or KKK pub that is
patently prejudicial to a particular group. -Jackie<br>
<br>
On 6/19/09 7:16 AM, "Deborah Leslie" <<a href="djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</a>>
wrote:<br>
I just had an epiphany. Some of you remember discussions held a few years ago
about the problem with the genre term “Literature of prejudice,”
which violates the cataloger’s ethic of labelling (works, people) in a
way they would not name themselves. But it is useful to have a term in the
hierarchy to collocate this kind of literature.<br>
<br>
How about “Polemical literature”?<br>
<br>
___________________________________________<br>
</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"'>Deborah
J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.<br>
Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library<br>
201 East Capitol St., s.E., Washington, D.C. 20003<br>
202.675-0369 (phone) 202.675-0328 (fax)<br>
<a href="djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</a> www.folger.edu</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>