Perhaps unsurprisingly, the posts in this thread resonate with several of the issues that have characterized discussions about the reformation of library cataloging rules in recent years, many of which start from the premise that it's been a long time since the catalog could be regarded as a mere library inventory, and since headings were the only points of access available to users. Seasoned researchers certainly know the LC call numbers associated with their disciplines, and I don't know for sure, but I suspect that call numbers are routinely used as access points (and/or as Jen points out, to browse within a catalog). So I wonder, along with Ryan, if you envision retaining LC numbers even as you impose a new classification schema.<br>
<br>Yours,<br>Mike G.<br><br>On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Robert Maxwell <<a href="mailto:robert_maxwell@byu.edu">robert_maxwell@byu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>> I’d just like to point out that patrons aren’t the only ones who browse<br>
> through the collection by call number. Our catalogers and curators routinely<br>> browse the collection, both physically and online in the catalog,<br>> particularly for things like collection assessment, or pulling like items<br>
> for presentations and classes.<br>><br>> <br>><br>> Bob<br>><br>> <br>><br>> Robert L. Maxwell<br>><br>> Special Collections and Ancient Languages Catalog Librarian<br>><br>> Genre/Form Authorities Librarian<br>
><br>> 6728 Harold B. Lee Library<br>><br>> Brigham Young University<br>><br>> Provo, UT 84602<br>><br>> (801)422-5568<br>><br>> <br>><br>> From: <a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>] On<br>
> Behalf Of Ann Myers<br>> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:33 AM<br>> To: DCRM Revision Group List<br>> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Non-LC classification<br>><br>> <br>><br>> David,<br>><br>> <br>
><br>> We have moved away from LC Classification in the last year. Books are now<br>> cataloged and shelved according to a simple numeric system. The primary<br>> consideration for us was lack of space in our rare book shelving area – the<br>
> numeric system means we don’t have to leave space in the middle for possible<br>> interfiling. We’ve also seen the advantages of faster cataloging and a<br>> simpler training process for anyone doing shelving or working with the<br>
> catalog records. The only potential downside that anyone has raised is that<br>> patrons will no longer be able to browse through the catalog by call number,<br>> but I am not convinced that many people had previously been doing that, and<br>
> there are subject headings and collection names in the records to help bring<br>> like things together in the catalog. The advantages of this system have far<br>> outweighed any possible disadvantages.<br>><br>
> <br>><br>> I’d be happy to share more details about how we implemented the change, so<br>> feel free to contact me with more questions if you have them.<br>><br>> <br>><br>> --Ann<br>><br>> <br>
><br>> Ann Myers<br>><br>> Special Collections Cataloger<br>><br>> Morris Library Mail Code 6632<br>><br>> Southern Illinois University Carbondale<br>><br>> 605 Agriculture Drive<br>><br>> Carbondale, IL 62901<br>
><br>> 618-453-1499<br>><br>> <a href="mailto:amyers@lib.siu.edu">amyers@lib.siu.edu</a><br>><br>> From: <a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>] On<br>
> Behalf Of Faulds, David<br>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:58 PM<br>> To: <a href="mailto:dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu</a><br>> Subject: [DCRM-L] Non-LC classification<br>><br>> <br>><br>
> Dear list,<br>><br>> <br>><br>> I’m wondering what advice other list members might have about moving away<br>> from an LC classification system to some form of alphanumeric system. The<br>> pros seem to outweigh the cons with faster cataloging, more efficient<br>
> shelving and more accurate reshelving verses the loss of browsing.<br>><br>> <br>><br>> So, what are the list’s thoughts on making this change? Has anyone<br>> considered it and decided against it? All comments would be appreciated.<br>
><br>> <br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> David.<br>><br>> <br>><br>> David Faulds, Rare Book Librarian<br>><br>> Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library<br>><br>> Emory University<br>><br>
> 540 Asbury Circle<br>><br>> Atlanta, GA 30322-2870<br>><br>> <a href="http://marbl.library.emory.edu">http://marbl.library.emory.edu</a><br>><br>> <br>><br>> <a href="mailto:dfaulds@emory.edu">dfaulds@emory.edu</a><br>
><br>> 404-712-2612<br>><br>> 404-727-0360 (fax)<br>><br>> <br>><br>> <br>><br>> ________________________________<br>><br>> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of<br>
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged<br>> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended<br>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution<br>
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly<br>> prohibited.<br>><br>> If you have received this message in error, please contact<br>> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the<br>
> original message (including attachments).<br><br>