<html>
<body>
Have you considered a uniform title with $k Fragments ? Not sure about
current practice. Dick<br><br>
At 09:39 AM 4/6/2010, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Has anyone approached the
cataloging of an individual leaf (or leaves) in a manner in which the
physical description reflects only what you have (vs. DCRM(B) 5B1.1)? The
question is prompted by a loan request in which the requester did not
realize that our "copy" was merely two leaves of a publication.
This information is stated in a local note, but one of our public
services librarians feels that this is not a very user friendly way of
saying we have only two leaves. <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Ryan<br>
<br>
--<br>
Ryan Hildebrand<br>
Book Cataloging Dept. Head<br>
Harry Ransom Center<br>
University of Texas at Austin<br>
P.O. Box 7219<br>
Austin, TX 78713-7219<br>
512-232-1681<br>
<a href="http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/">www.hrc.utexas.edu</a><br>
</blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=2>Dick R. Miller<br>
Director for Resource Management<br>
Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center</font> <br>
<font size=2>Information Resources & Technology (IRT)<br>
Stanford University Medical Center</font> <br>
<font size=2>300 Pasteur Drive, L109, Stanford, CA 94305-5123<br>
</font>dick@stanford.edu<br>
650.725.4615 (phone) 650.725-7471 (fax)<br>
</body>
</html>