<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Actually, there probably aren't DCRM records for much of what exists in
the database. So maybe just as well. Clever searching is probably best.
Thanks, Annie<br>
<br>
On 11/3/2010 10:34 AM, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:8160A9CA17FEBC488A19E00F367FFEDF1312BE2E@ARIEL.folger.edu"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Palatino Linotype";
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 5 5 3 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family: "Palatino Linotype","serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thanks
for Annie’s comment. I have mixed feelings about the no
de-duping of pre-1801 publications. Would OCLC really give preference
to dcrm
records if they were to de-dupe? Even over pcc records? <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">__________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Deborah
J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">RBMS
past chair 2010-2011 | Head of Cataloging, Folger
Shakespeare Library<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">201
East Capitol St., S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003 |
202.675-0369 (phone) 202.675-0328 (fax) | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:djleslie@folger.edu">djleslie@folger.edu</a> |
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.folger.edu">www.folger.edu</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family: "Palatino Linotype","serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family: "Palatino Linotype","serif"; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div
style="border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(181, 196, 223) -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt medium medium; padding: 3pt 0in 0in;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Tahoma","sans-serif";">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Tahoma","sans-serif";">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>ANN
W. COPELAND<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 02 November, 2010 22:45<br>
<b>To:</b> Erin Blake<br>
<b>Cc:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] OCLC de-duping algorithms and dates of
publication<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Interestingly, when we asked about permissible
duplicates
(one DCRM, one AACR2) OCLC said they did NOT want duplicate records.
Instead
they wanted to merge records with the DCRM record surviving as the
master
record. So, why exempt pre-1800 books from the de-duping? Why not work
the
algorithm to favor DCRM? <br>
<br>
Thanks, Annie<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>