<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:SimSun;
        panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
        {font-family:SimSun;
        panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"\@SimSun";
        panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Palatino Linotype";
        panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 5 5 3 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";
        color:#1F497D;
        font-weight:normal;
        font-style:normal;
        text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle22
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>I have a book, Tabart’s “True History of a Little Old Woman” (1806) which raised a similar question to me. There’s a 4-panel frontis. panorama (also found bound in at the end in some copies), bound in at the middle and folded out by opening each of two facing double-leaves.) It’s difficult to tell for sure if this was all printed together on one large leaf and then folded, or printed on 4 separate leaves, the same size at others, and then joined by the published, due to later reinforcement of the hinged places, but I think it was originally one engraved sheet.) <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Would this properly be counted as one leaf (with the fold-out noted in the 300 field description, with the dimensions, and detailed more in a 500 note), rather than as four leaves? <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>This leaf is printed on one side only, while the 12 other illustrated leaves in the book are printed back-to-back on both sides of the leaf, as is most of the text, so I think that “pages” is the appropriate unit for them? So we might wind up with illustrated leaves and pages in the description, which could be confusing? (Especially since the book was later issued with the 4 panorama leaves cut up and bound in as separate leaves so the number of ill. leaves in the 300 field could help distinguish the two variations.)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks for any thoughts!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Jeff Barton</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Cotsen Children's Library Cataloger</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Rare Books & Special Collections Department</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Princeton University Library<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>One Washington Rd.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Princeton, NJ 08544 <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><a href="mailto:jpbarton@princeton.edu"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>jpbarton@princeton.edu</span></a></span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'> </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>609-258-3166</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> <a href="mailto:[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu]">[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu]</a> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Deborah J. Leslie<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, December 01, 2010 5:59 PM<br><b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] Question about 5B9.1: counting leaves of plates folded and bound at the inner margin<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'>Hi Rebecca,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'>I'm afraid that each of those images spread across two leaves and bound in the middle are to be counted as [2] leaves of plates (distinct from folded leaves, which by definition can be unfolded.) DCRM(B) is not departing from previous practice. Any special information about the content of the plates – such as that there are 57 images on 107 plates – can be put in a note. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'>By the way, I looked up this title myself in OCLC, and the only dcrb record that I saw was ESTC cataloging in a Huntington record. Unfortunately, despite the coding, the ESTC frequently employs non-standard practices and cannot provide a reliable model for standard rare book cataloging. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'>I also noticed that many records have '32' or '[32]' leaves of plates, while others have '57' or '[57]'. Just think what a service you'll do, Rebecca, by creating an fully-correct and authoritative record for this title?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Palatino Linotype","serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> <a href="mailto:[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu]">[mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu]</a> <b>On Behalf Of </b>McCallum, Rebecca<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 01 December, 2010 15:35<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu">dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [DCRM-L] Question about 5B9.1: counting leaves of plates folded and bound at the inner margin<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hello everyone,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’d like to make sure that I’m correctly understanding DCRM(B) 5B9.1, specifically the sentence that says: <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>“Count a plate folded and bound at the inner margin as two leaves of plates.”<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m currently editing our bib record for John Ogilby’s “America: being the latest, and most accurate description of the Nevv VVorld…” published in 1671.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The book is full of plates that are folded and bound at the inner margin, as described in 5B9.1, but which really each represent a single image or map printed as a single leaf.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In various records in OCLC (none of which are DCRM(B) records, and only one of which is DCRB), the number of leaves of plates is generally listed as [57]. However, if I count those folded plates as two leaves, the total count should really be [107] leaves of plates. Is DCRM(B) departing from previous practice here? If so, how can I indicate that there are really only 57 images, rather than 107?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thank you for any clarification on this!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Rebecca<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Rebecca McCallum<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Cataloging Librarian<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Wesleyan University<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>252 Church Street<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Middletown, CT 06457<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>(860) 685-3839<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="mailto:rmccallum@wesleyan.edu">rmccallum@wesleyan.edu</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>