<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6001.18542" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Segoe UI">
<DIV>Dear all,</DIV>
<DIV>I am cataloging a print that is always listed under the printmaker Ambrogio Brambilla. No known impression is signed by Brambilla, and it's probably a copy of a print signed by another printmaker, so it is always listed as: Brambilla, Ambrogio, Attributed To.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For image and metadata in BM database, see:</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectid=1422862&partid=1&searchText=arboro+della+pazzia&fromADBC=ad&toADBC=ad&numpages=10&orig=%2fresearch%2fsearch_the_collection_database.aspx&currentPage=1">http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectid=1422862&partid=1&searchText=arboro+della+pazzia&fromADBC=ad&toADBC=ad&numpages=10&orig=%2fresearch%2fsearch_the_collection_database.aspx&currentPage=1</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Have others used the subfield j (i.e. Attribution Qualifier) of 100 in that case to list the plausible printmaker in 100, but with the qualifying "Attributed to" in subfield j. Or, is this is a case, where the printmaker is just listed in a 500 note.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Karen</DIV></BODY></HTML>