<font size="2"><font face="georgia,serif"><div>A "complete package" for labelling would not normally include anything in 5XX or beyond. If inaccuracies in the source are left intact and uncommnented, and only dealt with in notes, then the unwary (i.e. those who do not know why they ought to be wary) will produce misleading labels.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Most labels, or citations, for that matter, will stop after 2XX (using m.e. author, perhaps UT, title, and publication info), which normal people consider sufficient for correct identification, perhaps expecting that the catalog is with them in their expectation, not agin 'em.</div>
<br clear="all"></font></font><font face="'courier new', monospace">RICHARD NOBLE : RARE BOOKS CATALOGER : JOHN HAY LIBRARY : BROWN UNIVERSITY<br>PROVIDENCE, RI 02912 : 401-863-1187/FAX 863-3384 : <a href="mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE@BROWN.EDU" target="_blank">RICHARD_NOBLE@BROWN.EDU</a> </font><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Robert Maxwell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert_maxwell@byu.edu">robert_maxwell@byu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
(c) I'm not sure I understand why inclusion of "sic" or "i.e." would create a "complete package" for labeling.<br>
<br></blockquote></div>