<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p>The Music and Cartographics modules should be parallel, I think. Perhaps the editors of DCRMC could pipe in here. Personally (and only personally) I think we should leave it fairly generic as RDA-ized DCRM is still a moving target.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Nina<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div id="Signature">
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2">
<div class="PlainText">+----------<br>
Nina Schneider<br>
Head Cataloger<br>
William Andrews Clark Memorial Library<br>
University of California, Los Angeles<br>
2520 Cimarron Street<br>
Los Angeles, CA 90018<br>
<br>
(323) 731-8529<br>
nschneider@humnet.ucla.edu<br>
http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/clarklib/</div>
</font></div>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu <dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu> on behalf of Nancy Lorimer <nlorimer@stanford.edu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 8, 2015 12:42 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Revision Group List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [DCRM-L] DCRM(M) questions</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>Hi all,<br>
<br>
There is a week left to be sure, but I haven't received any real feedback as yet. I thought I might start things going by addressing my first general question, based on the following comment from the CC:DA/MLA task force.<br>
<br>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">DCRM(M) and RDA:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">It is our understanding that as of January 1, 2015, BIBCO catalogers are no longer allowed to use a nonRDA compliant standard for new BIBCOauthenticated cataloging. The BSRs for individual material types have
been combined into a single <em>PCC RDA BIBCO Standard Record (BSR) Metadata Application Profile</em></span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">4 </span><em><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">, </span></em><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">with
guidelines that provide for the combination of RDA and the other published DCRM modules.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">We are glad to learn that rare music provisions have already been included in the BSR, and that the description conventions code dcrmm has been established in advance of the </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">publication
of DCRM(M). It is our understanding that BIBCOauthenticated records can thus be coded as both RDA and DCRM(M) compliant, as is the case with the other published DCRM modules, and that this option is available for nonBIBCO records as well. While this was
not the case at the time of publication of the other modules, the DCRM(M) text has the opportunity to indicate that catalogers will have these options. Therefore we recommend that this situation be discussed with the PCC Standing Committee on Standards, and
suggest further clarification in DCRM(M) instructions on the possible combination of rules and conventions. This impacts the Introduction (specifically II.1; X.1.3; footnote 4), Appendix A, and Appendix B1.3.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif; color:#00b050"><i>My question.</i> We have the note agreed upon when the Graphics volume was published: “The relationship between the DCRM manuals and RDA is evolving. Current guidelines and other information can
be found on the RBMS website at <<a href="http://rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/dcrm/rda/dcrm-rda-html">http://rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/dcrm/rda/dcrm-rda-html>.”<br>
</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif; color:#00b050">Should we keep this or consider a change as suggested above? Whichever way, I will note that the link does not work anymore. It should be:<a href="http://rbms.info/dcrm/rda/">http://rbms.info/dcrm/rda/</a></span></p>
thanks<br>
Nancy<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Nancy Lorimer
Head, Metadata Dept
Stanford University Libraries
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nlorimer@stanford.edu">nlorimer@stanford.edu</a>
650-725-8819</pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>