<div dir="ltr"><div>Whew. Thanks for the quick clarification, Kate.<br><br></div>Liz<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Kate Moriarty <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:moriarks@slu.edu" target="_blank">moriarks@slu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Liz and Lenore,<div><br></div><div>You're right. I was remembering a discussion about automated RDA changes to OCLC records. Different issue - my apologies.</div><div><br></div><div>-Kate</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Rouse, Lenore <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rouse@cua.edu" target="_blank">rouse@cua.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    This is probably a dumb question, but even without amremm in a
    record, under  what circumstance would OCLC ever merge a record for
    a <u>manuscript</u>, which by definition is unique? I've operated
    under the assumption that I would never have to worry about our ms.
    records being merged.<br>
    <br>
    Re Jackie's question - I now catalog practically everything as DCRM
    but this was not the case in this institution until perhaps 10 years
    ago or whenever I wised up.  I haven't recataloged AACR2 records
    into dcrm either. So there are indeed many post 1801 items that
    might easily succumb to merging. I'd argue for an 1840 or 1850
    cutoff date but that might be too conservative for some.<span><font color="#888888"><br>
    Lenore<br>
    <br>
    <pre cols="72">-- 
Lenore M. Rouse
Curator, Rare Books and Special Collections
The Catholic University of America
Room 214, Mullen Library
620 Michigan Avenue N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20064

PHONE: <a href="tel:202%20319-5090" value="+12023195090" target="_blank">202 319-5090</a>
E-MAIL: <a href="mailto:rouse@cua.edu" target="_blank">rouse@cua.edu</a>
RBSC BLOG: <a href="http://ascendonica.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://ascendonica.blogspot.com/</a> </pre></font></span><div><div>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div>On 9/4/2015 11:37 AM, Kate Moriarty
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">Thank you for this, Jackie and John.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>As others have stated, I would be in favor of moving the
          cut-off date to a later date, though I'll leave it to those
          with a larger post-1801 collection to suggest a specific date.<br>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Jackie, regarding your 2nd question, I believe you
            mentioned last year that OCLC would be adding "amremm" to
            the list of 040 $e DDR exemptions. You said it wouldn't be
            easy - have you had any success with it?</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>And in answer to your last question, we regularly code
            the 040 $e here and, at least from the records I see in
            OCLC, it seems like others do, too.</div>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Thanks,<br>
          Kate</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:51 AM,
          Chapman,John <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chapmanj@oclc.org" target="_blank">chapmanj@oclc.org</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>Richard and Francis,</div>
                    <div> </div>
                    <div>We are asking if the 1801 cutoff (or the 1901
                      cartographic exception date) need to be adjusted,
                      but are not suggesting that it should be earlier.
                      We would expect that, if a change is agreed upon,
                      the dates would be later.</div>
                    <div> </div>
                    <div>We are asking the question of the DCRM-L
                      community to see if there is any consensus that
                      can be reached about a change, or if the current
                      scheme is logical and can remain. The context that
                      Richard provided should be helpful in the
                      discussion.</div>
                    <div> </div>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div>--</div>
                        <div>
                          <div>John Chapman</div>
                          <div>OCLC · Product Manager, Metadata Services</div>
                          <div>6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017 USA
                             </div>
                          <div>T <a href="tel:%2B1-614-761-5272" value="+16147615272" target="_blank">+1-614-761-5272</a></div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <span>
                <div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:12pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu" target="_blank">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>>
                  on behalf of "Noble, Richard"<br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span>DCRM
                  Users' Group<br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Friday,
                  September 4, 2015 at 10:23 AM<br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>DCRM Users'
                  Group<br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
                  [DCRM-L] OCLC's duplicate detection & resolution
                  software: two questions for the rare and archival
                  materials communities<br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">Quick
                            response: the cut-off for books should, if
                            anything, be later, not earlier. The year
                            1801 is arbitrary, as much established as it
                            is in national bibliographies and the like.
                            It seems to be understood as the end of the
                            "hand-press period", which is historically
                            not the case. For English books that would
                            be no earlier than 1820, and for some
                            continental books even later (I see German
                            books of the 1840s printed direct from type
                            on handmade laid paper, for instance).</div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">But
                            the bibliographical significance of
                            "hand-press" has been great exaggerated.
                            While printers become more and more adept at
                            covering their tracks as the c19 proceeds,
                            bibliographical analysis and description are
                            very much applicable to post-1801 books and
                            post "hand-press" books, for the most basic
                            of our FRBR purposes: the identification of
                            manifestations, and, at the most learned
                            level, the specification of diagnostic
                            evidence for distinction of manifestations,
                            as well as explicit accounting for evidence
                            of variation within the body of items that
                            constitute a manifestation.</div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">That
                            said, I suppose--assuming that the exemption
                            of dcrm records from automatic de-duping
                            continues--the idea is to establish criteria
                            by which to exempt a range of non-dcrm
                            records as well. Earlier versions of dcrm
                            tended to emphasize 1801/"hand-press period"
                            as a cutoff for application of the special
                            rules (and the consequent finer-grained
                            analysis of supporting evidence and
                            variation), so it it made sense of a kind to
                            specify that range. As tempting as it is,
                            however, to limit dcrm to hand-press books
                            because it is easier to analyze and describe
                            them, I know from considerable experience
                            that post-1801 books printed from plates,
                            perhaps based on mechanical composition, are
                            equally and more subtly variable.</div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">The
                            whole body of pre-1801 works forms, I
                            presume, a relatively small percentage of
                            the material represented in the database,
                            though the mass of duplicate records
                            generated by uploading of incommensurably
                            cataloged material is considerable. The
                            problem is not so much the conflation of
                            different manifestations indifferently
                            described, as it is the loss of information
                            that takes place when merged records are
                            expunged, which precludes conscious and
                            focused comparison--by catalogers well
                            versed in the vagaries of legacy and minimal
                            cataloging--as a check on de-duping errors.</div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small"><br>
                          </div>
                          <div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif;font-size:small">I
                            would be dismayed to see an irreversible
                            process applied to an even greater range of
                            materials than before. IRs being a lost
                            cause, this would be mitigated to some
                            extent if records represented in 019 fields
                            could be preserved for inspection (beyond
                            the current brief grace period) in such a
                            way as not to impede the operations of the
                            WorldCat as a whole. But as Francis Lapka
                            pointed out, the regression of the date
                            cutoff does seem to be a retraction, not an
                            expansion, of safeguards.</div>
                        </div>
                        <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
                          <div>
                            <div><font face="courier new,monospace">RICHARD
                                NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER ::
                                JOHN HAY LIBRARY</font>
                              <div><font face="courier new,monospace">BROWN
                                  UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912
                                   ::  <a href="tel:401-863-1187" value="+14018631187" target="_blank">401-863-1187</a></font></div>
                              <div><span><</span><a href="mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE@BROWN.EDU" target="_blank">Richard_Noble@Br</a><span><a href="http://own.edu" target="_blank">own.edu</a></span><span>></span></div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <br>
                          <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015
                            at 9:00 AM, Lapka, Francis <span dir="ltr">
                              <<a href="mailto:francis.lapka@yale.edu" target="_blank">francis.lapka@yale.edu</a>></span>
                            wrote:<br>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                              <div link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" lang="EN-US">
                                <div>
                                  <p><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Jackie,</span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:Georgia,serif"></span></p>
                                  <p><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">I'm
                                      grateful for your message, and
                                      pleased to hear that OCLC is
                                      considering changes "to expand and
                                      strengthen the safeguards we
                                      already apply to bibliographic
                                      records for unique, rare, and/or
                                      archival materials."</span></p>
                                  <div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">At
                                          first blush, it would seem
                                          that moving the chronological
                                          exception for de-duping to an
                                          earlier date might *weaken*
                                          the safeguards, since it would
                                          make the exception apply to a
                                          smaller set of records. Could
                                          you tell us more about the
                                          motivation for this particular
                                          change and how it might serve
                                          to strengthen the safeguards?</span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif"> </span></p>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Thanks<span></span></span></p>
                                      <span></span></div>
                                    <span><font color="#888888">
                                        <div>
                                          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Georgia,serif">Francis</span></p>
                                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                                          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                                        </div>
                                      </font></span></div>
                                  <div>
                                    <div>
                                      <div>
                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#787878">On
                                            Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 4:18
                                            AM, Dooley,Jackie <<a href="mailto:dooleyj@oclc.org" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:dooleyj@oclc.org" target="_blank">dooleyj@oclc.org</a>>
                                            wrote:</span></p>
                                      </div>
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                                      <div>
                                        <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                                          <div>
                                            <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"> 
                                                             </span>
                                              Dear DCRM-L -- </p>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <span></span></p>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">On
                                                  behalf of my
                                                  colleagues on OCLC's
                                                  Metadata Quality Team,
                                                  I'm writing to pose
                                                  two questions: 1)
                                                  whether the pre-1801
                                                  cutoff for excluding
                                                  records from
                                                  de-duplication should
                                                  be changed to an
                                                  earlier date, and 2)
                                                  whether additional
                                                  cataloging code
                                                  symbols should be
                                                  added to the 040 $e
                                                  exception. </p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">We're
                                                  considering changes to
                                                  the automated
                                                  Duplicate Detection
                                                  and Resolution (DDR)
                                                  software and are
                                                  seeking community
                                                  opinion before taking
                                                  action. The
                                                  contemplated changes
                                                  are
                                                  <b>intended to expand
                                                    and strengthen the
                                                    safeguards we
                                                    already apply to
                                                    bibliographic
                                                    records for unique,
                                                    rare, and/or
                                                    archival materials</b>. As
                                                  members of the rare
                                                  and/or archival
                                                  cataloging community,
                                                  you are in an
                                                  excellent position to
                                                  provide informed
                                                  advice on these
                                                  issues.<span></span></p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white"> </p>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">First,
                                                  some background. OCLC
                                                  first developed the
                                                  capability to merge
                                                  bibliographic records
                                                  manually in 1983.
                                                  During the late 1980s
                                                  and early 1990s, we
                                                  developed automated
                                                  DDR software, which
                                                  dealt with Books
                                                  records only. From
                                                  2005 through 2009,
                                                  OCLC developed a
                                                  completely new version
                                                  of DDR that worked
                                                  with all bibliographic
                                                  formats. From the very
                                                  beginning of automated
                                                  DDR back in 1991,
                                                  <b>records for
                                                    resources with dates
                                                    of
                                                    publication/production
                                                    earlier than 1801
                                                    have been set aside
                                                    and not processed</b>.
                                                  More recently, in
                                                  consultation with the
                                                  American Library
                                                  Association (ALA) Map
                                                  and Geospatial
                                                  Information Round
                                                  Table (MAGIRT)
                                                  Cataloging and
                                                  Classification
                                                  Committee (CCC), we
                                                  have further <b>exempted
                                                    records for
                                                    cartographic
                                                    materials with dates
                                                    of publication
                                                    earlier than 1901</b>.
                                                  <b>In addition, </b>we
                                                  exempt from DDR
                                                  processing all records
                                                  for resources that can
                                                  be identified as<b>
                                                    photographs
                                                    (Material Types
                                                    “pht” for photograph
                                                    and/or “pic” for
                                                    picture)</b>.</p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">Following
                                                  discussions with
                                                  representatives of the
                                                  rare materials
                                                  community several
                                                  years ago,
                                                  <b>we also exempted
                                                    from DDR processing
                                                    all records that are
                                                    coded in field 040
                                                    subfield $e under
                                                    description
                                                    conventions for rare
                                                    materials codes
                                                    "bdrb", "dcrb",
                                                    "dcrmb”, or “dcrms</b>.”
                                                  Please note that these
                                                  DDR exemptions are
                                                  <i>not</i> intended to
                                                  apply to electronic,
                                                  microform, or other
                                                  reproductions, only to
                                                  the original
                                                  resources.<span></span></p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">The
                                                  current DDR software
                                                  is incredibly
                                                  complicated and
                                                  continues to be
                                                  fine-tuned on a
                                                  regular basis.
                                                  Although this is an
                                                  oversimplification of
                                                  a complex process,
                                                  there are now at least
                                                  two dozen different
                                                  points of comparison
                                                  taken into
                                                  consideration. Many of
                                                  these comparison
                                                  points draw data from
                                                  multiple parts of a
                                                  bibliographic record
                                                  and involve
                                                  manipulation of data
                                                  in ways designed to
                                                  distinguish both
                                                  variations that should
                                                  be equated and
                                                  distinctions that must
                                                  be recognized.<span></span></p>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in;background:white">As
                                                  part of our ongoing
                                                  efforts to improve
                                                  DDR’s accuracy, we are
                                                  reaching out again to
                                                  members of the rare
                                                  materials and archival
                                                  resources communities,
                                                  in particular, for
                                                  feedback on the
                                                  following questions:</p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <blockquote style="margin-left:30.0pt;margin-right:0in">
                                            <ol start="1" type="1">
                                              <li class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">Within
                                                the context of the
                                                materials cataloged by
                                                your community, are
                                                there dates other than
                                                pre-1801 for most
                                                resources and pre-1901
                                                for cartographic
                                                materials that would
                                                make more sense as an
                                                exemption cutoff?</li>
                                              <li class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">The
                                                current list of
                                                Description Convention
                                                Source Codes, found at
                                                <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.loc.gov_standards_sourcelist_descriptive-2Dconventions.html&d=AwMGaQ&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=kRqExyp5bTagfw4W-s3iO-qvtjTFj_59J74agId44nI&s=MJfHI5B_tV51Vx2wSKcLJQY4vkqu3ua9UEvXyUqqX8c&e=" target="_blank">
</a><a href="http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/descriptive-conventions.html" target="_blank">http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/descriptive-conventions.html</a>,
                                                has grown much more
                                                extensive in recent
                                                years. Aside from the
                                                four codes already
                                                exempted ("bdrb",
                                                "dcrb", "dcrmb”,
                                                “dcrms”), are there
                                                others that it would
                                                make sense to consider
                                                exempting? Note
                                                that Description
                                                Convention Source Codes
                                                “appm”, “dacs”, “gihc”,
                                                and “dcrmg” have already
                                                been suggested for
                                                adding to the exemption
                                                list.
                                              </li>
                                            </ol>
                                            <ol start="2" type="1">
                                              <ol start="1" type="1">
                                                <li class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">Are
                                                  there other
                                                  well-accepted rare
                                                  and/or archival
                                                  materials descriptive
                                                  standards that don’t
                                                  currently have their
                                                  own code, and so are
                                                  absent from the MARC
                                                  Code List? If so,
                                                  would the relevant
                                                  community be willing
                                                  to request codes from
                                                  LC?</li>
                                                <li class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">How
                                                  faithfully do members
                                                  of the relevant
                                                  community actually
                                                  code such records in
                                                  field 040 subfield $e?</li>
                                              </ol>
                                            </ol>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <div>
                                                  <div>
                                                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                                  </div>
                                                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">Please
                                                    reply either to the
                                                    list or to me
                                                    directly. We greatly
                                                    appreciate your
                                                    input.</p>
                                                </div>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                            <div>
                                              <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                            </div>
                                            <div>
                                              <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">Many
                                                thanks— Jackie</p>
                                            </div>
                                            <div>
                                              <div>
                                                <div>
                                                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                                </div>
                                                <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
                                                  <tbody>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="width:100.0%;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in" valign="top" width="100%">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#333f48">-</span></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="width:100.0%;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" valign="top" width="100%">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#333f48">Jackie Dooley</span></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" valign="bottom">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#333f48">Program Officer, OCLC Research</span></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" valign="bottom">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#333f48">647 Camino de los Mares, Suite 108-240</span></p>
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#333f48">San Clemente, CA 92673</span></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in" valign="bottom">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal">office/home
                                                          <a href="tel:949-492-5060" value="+19494925060" target="_blank">
                                                          949-492-5060</a><br>
                                                          mobile <a href="tel:949-295-1529" value="+19492951529" target="_blank">949-295-1529</a><br>
                                                          <a href="mailto:dooleyj@oclc.org" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:dooleyj@oclc.org" target="_blank">dooleyj@oclc.org</a></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="padding:6.0pt 0in 3.75pt 0in" valign="top">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.oclc.org_home.en.html-3Fcmpid-3Demailsig-5Flogo&d=AwMGaQ&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=kRqExyp5bTagfw4W-s3iO-qvtjTFj_59J74agId44nI&s=dnyUTanaqjBHSVV1FdTIEoNm6hDTbjlsRHIvE8OGviQ&e=" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue;text-decoration:none"><img src="http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/ext-ref/emailsignature/oclc-logo-emailsignature.png" alt="OCLC" height="42" border="0" width="118"></span></a></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                    <tr>
                                                      <td style="padding:0in 0in 4.5pt 0in" valign="top">
                                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#2178b5"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.oclc.org_home.en.html-3Fcmpid-3Demailsig-5Flink&d=AwMGaQ&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=kRqExyp5bTagfw4W-s3iO-qvtjTFj_59J74agId44nI&s=TS_w0TQQ5p-iCY6URnpdmON9jBXJFIqhge-Llx6W-ms&e=" target="_blank"><span style="color:#2178b5;text-decoration:none">OCLC.org</span></a>/research</span></p>
                                                      </td>
                                                    </tr>
                                                  </tbody>
                                                </table>
                                                <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </blockquote>
                                          <div>
                                            <div>
                                              <blockquote style="margin-left:30.0pt;margin-right:0in">
                                                <div>
                                                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> </p>
                                                </div>
                                              </blockquote>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                        </blockquote>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </blockquote>
                          </div>
                          <br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </span>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr">Kate S. Moriarty, MSW, MLS  |  Rare Book
            Catalog Librarian  |  Associate Professor  |  Pius XII
            Memorial Library  |  Room 320-2<br>
            Saint Louis University  |  3650 Lindell Blvd . |  St. Louis,
            MO 63108  |  <a href="tel:%28314%29%20977-3024" value="+13149773024" target="_blank">(314) 977-3024</a> (tel)  |  <a href="tel:%28314%29%20977-3108" value="+13149773108" target="_blank">(314) 977-3108</a> (fax) 
            |  <a href="mailto:moriarks@slu.edu" target="_blank">moriarks@slu.edu</a>  |  <a href="http://libraries.slu.edu/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://libraries.slu.edu/" target="_blank">http://libraries.slu.edu/</a></div>
        </div>
      </font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    </font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    <pre cols="72">
</pre>
  </font></span></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">

</font></span></blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr">Kate S. Moriarty, MSW, MLS  |  Rare Book Catalog Librarian  |  Associate Professor  |  Pius XII Memorial Library  |  Room 320-2<br>Saint Louis University  |  3650 Lindell Blvd . |  St. Louis, MO 63108  |  (314) 977-3024 (tel)  |  (314) 977-3108 (fax)  |  <a href="mailto:moriarks@slu.edu" target="_blank">moriarks@slu.edu</a>  |  <a href="http://libraries.slu.edu/" target="_blank">http://libraries.slu.edu/</a></div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Elizabeth O'Keefe<br>Director of Collection Information Systems<br>The Morgan Library & Museum<br>225 Madison Avenue<br>New York, NY  10016-3405<br> <br>TEL: 212 590-0380<br>FAX: 2127685680<br>NET: <a href="mailto:eokeefe@themorgan.org" target="_blank">eokeefe@themorgan.org</a><br><br>Visit CORSAIR, the Library's comprehensive collections catalog:<br><a href="http://corsair.themorgan.org" target="_blank">http://corsair.themorgan.org</a><br></div></div>
</div>