<html><body><div style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Note that subfield $9 is reserved for local definition. If you are proposing this as an addition to MARC, then you need to pick a different subfield.<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div style="padding-left: 30px;">John Attig<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div style="padding-left: 30px;">Penn State University<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Lapka, Francis" <francis.lapka@yale.edu><br><b>To: </b>"DCRM Users' Group" <dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:16:58 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [DCRM-L] subfields $3 and $5 to specify copies in MARC bib records<br></blockquote></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">
<style><!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Calibri Light";
panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Georgia",serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Georgia",serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">I see the sense in that suggestion, too. Using a record control number would be the most explicit means possible to refer to a Holding entity (a copy). My concern
with using $w is that this subfield may also serve as control number for the heading (e.g. the name or genre).
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">I suppose I imagined a subfield that isn’t too prescriptive about the form of identifier used. It could be the control number for the Holding, or it could be the full
call number (and there are other possibilities), e.g.: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">700 1_
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">‡a Lindley, John, ‡d 1799-1865, ‡e former owner. ‡5 CtY-BA ‡9 BACRB G240 .H35 1589+</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">Mind you, I’m not entirely sure that such an addition/modification to our MARC vocabulary is necessary or will make our next transition easier, but I think it merits
consideration.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">Francis</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Deborah J. Leslie<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:56 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [DCRM-L] subfields $3 and $5 to specify copies in MARC bib records</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D">What about dropping the "Bibliographic" from ‡w Bibliographic record control number, and authorize for a larger number of fields?
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.loc.gov_marc_bibliographic_ecbdcntf.html&d=AwMF-Q&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=6NsVdZEESTdegHN3eSmGrE_-3euko22dM4BsGgzY_UU&s=NN0KxyBFRDOHiYBQOHCUdXnjWUhJ9KYOtcMK8lNUFpU&e=" target="_blank">https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdcntf.html</a>
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#31849B">Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library |
<a href="mailto:djleslie@folger.edu" target="_blank">djleslie@folger.edu</a> | 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www. folger.edu</span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#1F497D"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">
<a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu" target="_blank">dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a> [<a href="mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu" target="_blank">mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Lapka, Francis<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 13 January 2016 10:04<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu" target="_blank">dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [DCRM-L] subfields $3 and $5 to specify copies in MARC bib records</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">As we prepare for life After-MARC, I think it would be handy to have a clear means to associate copy-specific data in a bib record with the copy to which it applies, for example for data in fields
655 and 7xx. I’m concerned that MARC doesn’t currently provide an adequate means.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">MARC gives us subfield $5 to record the institution to which a field applies. But as defined, this field cannot specify a copy. See:
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.loc.gov_marc_holdings_echdcntf.html&d=AwMF-Q&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=6NsVdZEESTdegHN3eSmGrE_-3euko22dM4BsGgzY_UU&s=7vI2pE8-BPpdWx_jtgd8KjAJJFJGHG5H5vHWQTPZa9o&e=" target="_blank">
http://www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/echdcntf.html</a></span><br data-mce-bogus="1"></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">MARC gives us subfield $3 to record “the part of the described materials to which the field applies.” I have seen subfield $3 used to specify an individual copy – where there is more than one copy
described in a bib record – but this seems an imperfect match to the scope of subfield $3. The flawed suitability of subfield $3 is made most clear in the wording used to define its scope within the 563 field, for bindings: “Portion of the binding that is
described in the field.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">This leaves me with little faith that subfield $3 can serve as a machine actionable means to match copy-specific data in a bib record with its related copy entity – for now, a Holdings record; someday,
an Item entity – when subfield $3 may also be used to denote the portion of a manifestation to which data applies. I have doubts that it can effectively serve both functions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">Should we explore a new subfield? Are there any left? Or modify $5 to include institution and copy identifier?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">Francis</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Francis Lapka · Catalog Librarian</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Department of Rare Books and Manuscripts</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Yale Center for British Art</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">203.432.9672 ·
<a href="mailto:francis.lapka@yale.edu" target="_blank">francis.lapka@yale.edu</a></span><br data-mce-bogus="1"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">YALE CENTER FOR BRITISH ART REOPENS</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">The Center
<a href="http://britishart.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Exhibition%20Press%20Releases/Overview%20Press%20Release%281%29.pdf" target="_blank">
will reopen</a> on May 11, 2016.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">BUILDING CONSERVATION PROJECT</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">The Center is currently closed for
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bit.ly_1qAAcGv&d=AwMF-Q&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=t7GDkvcZa922K6iya7a6MxgVxxw7OjL0m1rPBXkflk4&m=6NsVdZEESTdegHN3eSmGrE_-3euko22dM4BsGgzY_UU&s=nVw6SekPrTk8gooNg28QNdHmwQ6_ilz8iuhgvSO8i7s&e=" target="_blank">
building conservation</a>. Please e-mail the <a href="mailto:ycba.reference@yale.edu" target="_blank">
Reference Library</a> and the <a href="mailto:ycba.studyroom@yale.edu" target="_blank">
Study Room</a> to request special appointments, which will be accommodated on a limited basis, contingent upon the construction schedule.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> </p>
</div><br></blockquote></div></div></body></html>