<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Calibri Light";
panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
p.xmsonormal, li.xmsonormal, div.xmsonormal
{mso-style-name:x_msonormal;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">I am putting out a second call for responses to this question (see original email below) proposed to the list before Midwinter. Please respond by the end of next week.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">I have heard from a couple people that their responses are not making it to the list. The problem tends to be that the email they are sending from does not match the email they signed up for the
listserv. In these cases, DCRM-L drops the message and no notice is sent to the sender. If you think your response may have been lost, please feel free to contact me off list.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">To start discussion…I am posting the text of one these lost emails that was recently sent to me.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">"The order of sources proposed by RBMS PS 2.2.2.2 seems relevant and effective to me (with the caveat that I don't catalog notated music and have done very few serials).
And I'm comfortable with the fact that the proposed order could result in a different title than that identified by using the RDA order of sources. Titles are important in identifying manifestations so it's not insignificant to possibly have two different
titles depending on the guideline you use but I think it's warranted here. The source order you suggest is closest to how rare materials identify themselves which allows for more accurate representation of the material and facilitates user tasks. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">It seems odd that we would instruct to ignore the early printed resources exception, though. I know a previous proposal by the RSC Rare Materials Working
Group to change RDA 2.2.2.2 was not accepted and was withdrawn. Is the plan to issue a new proposal based on this RBMS PS?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Kate"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black">Kate S. Moriarty, MSW, MLS | Rare Book Catalog Librarian | Associate Professor | Pius XII Memorial Library | Saint Louis University | 3650 Lindell Blvd. | St. Louis, MO 63108
| 314-977-3024 | <a href="mailto:kate.moriarty@slu.edu">kate.moriarty@slu.edu</a> | <a href="http://lib.slu.edu/special-collections" id="LPNoLP">http://lib.slu.edu/special-collections</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> DCRM-L [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces@lib.byu.edu] <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Mascaro, Michelle<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 17, 2018 3:45 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l@lib.byu.edu><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [DCRM-L] RBMS Q3: Sources of information<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Happy New Year. The next issue I would like to present for community discussion is sources of information. The current draft of the RBMS PS proposes a different order of preference for choosing a source of information for resources that
lack a title page than what is in RDA proper (including the RDA early print resources exception). Due to the complexity of the changes, I am attaching a copy of the 2.2 RBMS PS side by side with RDA text for additional context. (I omitted the RDA instructions
for subrules where there are no PS.) The section about manifestations with no title page, title sheet, or title card is under 2.2.2. I am particularly interested in community feedback on both the proposed order and general thoughts on whether it is problematic
for the RBMS PS to deviate from RDA here. (Technically, the same resource could be described with two different title whether one is following RDA proper or the RBMS PS.)
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#002060">Michelle Mascaro<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">Head, Special Collections Metadata<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">University of California, San Diego
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">(</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif">858) 534-6759
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif"><a href="mailto:mmascaro@ucsd.edu">mmascaro@ucsd.edu</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>