0A (DCRB-AACR2 analysis)

[Patrick Russell]

Hi all:

Yes; Revise the language concerning "time" -- i.e., can apply to later
materials.  

Scope: Changing "books" to "materials" is o.k.; howeer, we already have an
"independent draft" for serials, and similar units have been proposed for
maps and music.  There is a limit to "inclusivity" of text as it stands.  I
think we need to move a bit farther in discusssions of how "other" material
will appear in DCRB, and/or related txts, trhen revisit wording of 0A.

Yes; Remove last paragraph.

Patrick

At 03:05 PM 6/3/99 -0600, Robert Maxwell wrote:
>
>http://www.lib.byu.edu/~catalog/people/rlm/bsc/dcrb/0A.htm
>
>Recommendations:
>
>Revise the language of 0A to encourage rather than discourage the use of
>DCRB for later materials; revise also to include within the scope of DCRM
>other materials than monographs. This could mainly be accomplished by
>changing "books" to "materials." A paragraph should probably be added
>making this explicit, however, mentioning serials, music, etc.
>
>Remove the last paragraph.
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Robert L. Maxwell
>Special Collections and Ancient Languages Cataloger
>6428 Harold B. Lee Library
>Brigham Young University
>Provo, UT 84602
>(801) 378-5568
>robert_maxwell at byu.edu
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>