NEED RESPONSE - Topic 6: Glossary: "FIGURE"
Sider, Sandra
Sandra.Sider at sothebys.com
Wed Nov 3 08:11:53 MST 1999
I thought about including "Figure" because I see cataloguing descriptions
that seem to confuse "figure" and "plate." In this Age of Recon,
unqualified folks are trying to do multitudes of rare book records.
Sandra
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deborah J. Leslie [SMTP:DJLeslie at FOLGER.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 10:16 AM
> To: 'dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu'
> Subject: RE: NEED RESPONSE - Topic 6: Glossary: "FIGURE"
>
> No--I don't see why it ought to be included. Do you have an argument to
> support its inclusion? --DJL
>
> ________________________
> Deborah J. Leslie
> Head of Cataloging
> Folger Shakespeare Library
> 201 East Capitol Street, S.E.
> Washington, D.C. 20003
> (202) 675-0369
> (202) 675-0328 (fax)
> djleslie at folger.edu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sider, Sandra [mailto:Sandra.Sider at sothebys.com]
> Sent: 03 November 1999 9:59 AM
> To: 'DCRB-l at lib.byu.edu'
> Subject: NEED RESPONSE - Topic 6: Glossary: "FIGURE"
>
>
> Could everyone please take a moment to vote "YES" or "NO" about whether
> "Figure" should be included in the DCRB Glossary?
>
> Also, here is how I see it:
> While a figure IS (usually) an illustration, a plate CONTAINS illustrative
> material--whether a numbered figure or not. Yes?
>
> Thanks, Sandra
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manon Theroux [SMTP:manon.theroux at yale.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 8:36 PM
> > To: dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu
> > Subject: Topic 6: Glossary: "FIGURE"
> >
> > First, what is the rationale for adding the term in the first place?
> Will
> > it appear in the DCRM rules? If not, why do we need it in the glossary?
> >
> > As for the definition itself, it seems natural to first consult existing
> > glossaries. Glaister's Encyclopedia of the Book (2nd ed.) has a
> > definition
> > that closely resembles Sandra's earlier version:
> >
> > "figure: 1. an illustration on a page of text with which it is printed
> > from a forme imposed together with type. Cf. plate. 2. see numerals."
> >
> > I find no definition in either Carter's ABC for Book Collectors (7th
> ed.)
> > or Peters's The Bookman's Glossary (5th ed.) .
> >
> > Is there an authoritative source that backs up the revised definition
> > suggested below? If plates can also contain figures, then how does a
> > figure differ from an illustration? And how does the numbering fit in?
> >
> > --Manon
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > >From: "Sider, Sandra" <Sandra.Sider at sothebys.com>
> > >To: "'dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu'" <dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu>
> > >Subject: I must be stupid today--Elizabeth is correct re. "FIGURE"
> > >Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 18:21:05 +0100
> > >
> > >Everyone should ignore my previous post re. "figure." I have edited
> the
> > >entry for "Figure" below, q.v.
> > >
> > >Any further comments?
> > >
> >
> > >> Figure. [N.B.: new term.] An illustration printed on a page of
> text,
> > >> or printed on a page which is an integral part of a gathering.
> Plates
> > can
> > >> also contain numbered figures. See also Plate.
> > >>
> > >> Plate. A primarily illustrative leaf that is (usually) not an
> integral
> > >> part of a gathering. Tables, scores, and similar material printed on
> > leaves
> > >> that are not an integral part of a gathering are also treated as
> > plates.
> > See
> > >> also Figure.
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> for the presence of computer viruses.
> **********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list