DCRM(S) general comment on revision process

[Deborah J. Leslie]

Thanks, Jane, I think that will be helpful. 

Re: Bob's points, I agree with all of them. --DJL

-----Original Message-----
From: Jane Gillis [mailto:jane.gillis at yale.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:12 PM
To: dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: Re: DCRM(S) general comment on revision process


I think the best approach is to hold off making changes.  I will not make
any changes through next week and see what we have and see how much
discussion there is.

Everyone can now respond to each of Bob's points!  I will also try to
respond to each of them.

Jane

At 10:45 AM 1/24/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Jane & Juliet, 
>
>I have been working my way through the rules, writing down comments, but
>waiting to compile & send them until I get all the way through. So although
>I am glad to see you are responsive to Bob's comments, I find that making
>your document a moving target makes my task significantly more complicated.
>If it is feasible, I wonder if instead of just changing the text, you could
>mark the changes, perhaps by striking through the deleted text and putting
>added text in a different color, much the way the word processing programs
>"track" changes. 
>
>Else, perhaps you could just hold off on making any changes to the posted
>version of the text for now, giving those of us who are inspired and
>motivated by the conference to turn our attention to DCRM(S).  
>
>When we were looking at AMREMM, Gregory responded to comments on the list,
>either agreeing or disagreeing, and thus continuing to engage us all in the
>revision process. Maybe Gregory can comment on how it was from his end, but
>I liked that approach, and believe I would like to see something like it
for
>the DCRM(S) revision.
>
>Cheers, and it was great seeing everyone in Washington.
>_________________
>Deborah J. Leslie
>Head of Cataloging
>Folger Shakespeare Library
>201 East Capitol St., S.E.
>Washington, D.C. 20003
>202.675-0369 (p)
>202.675-0328 (f)
>djleslie at folger.edu
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jane Gillis [mailto:jane.gillis at yale.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:12 AM
>To: dcrb-l at lib.byu.edu
>Subject: Re: DCRM(S) pt. 0
>
>
>Bob (and others),
>
>I have made the changes to 0D and 0E that Bob recommends below.  Juliet and
>I have talked about 0A1 and have made some changes.  Does this help?
>
>If anyone has anything they would like to add, just reply.