[DCRM-L] Pagination and Note Questions

Wickenden Jane cat1 at inm.mod.uk
Fri Jan 12 07:25:29 MST 2007


Personally I would produce two records, one for each part:

To the first I would add an analytical author-title entry for the second, and a 501 entry of some kind for "Bound with".

And vice versa.

Good luck!

Jane

*****************************************
Mrs J.V.S. Wickenden, MA (Oxon) Dip.Lib.
Historic Collections Library
Institute of Naval Medicine
Alverstoke
Gosport
Hants.  PO12 2DL

tel: 023 9276 8238
e-m: cat1 at inm.mod.uk
*****************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Jenny Schroeder
Sent: 12 January 2007 14:21
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: [DCRM-L] Pagination and Note Questions

I am been cataloging individual medical theses from the University of 
Edinburgh that are bound together by year.

I recently came across a thesis that consists of two non-complete theses 
with the same title but different authors bound together as if they were 
one complete thesis.

My questions are:

How would I record pagination since I actually have two different and 
non-complete theses (pages 19-22 and pages 9-21)?
    -- Should it be: [2] leaves, p. 19-22, p. 9-21.

How would I document the signatures since I have two different 
non-complete theses bound as if they are one thesis?
    -- I think I would not attempt to record the signatures since they 
are so confusing and out of order.

How would I document a note explaining what the error is and what this 
bound thesis consists of (two non-complete theses)?
    -- Should it be: Mis-bound thesis consists of p. 19-22 of Lachlan 
John Cameron's thesis Dissertatio medica inauguralis de enteritide ; 
Missing p. 1-8.

Thanks so much,

Jenny Schroeder
Ebling Health Sciences Library
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Information Resources Unit






More information about the DCRM-L mailing list