[DCRM-L] Pagination and Note Questions
Wickenden Jane
cat1 at inm.mod.uk
Fri Jan 12 07:25:29 MST 2007
Personally I would produce two records, one for each part:
To the first I would add an analytical author-title entry for the second, and a 501 entry of some kind for "Bound with".
And vice versa.
Good luck!
Jane
*****************************************
Mrs J.V.S. Wickenden, MA (Oxon) Dip.Lib.
Historic Collections Library
Institute of Naval Medicine
Alverstoke
Gosport
Hants. PO12 2DL
tel: 023 9276 8238
e-m: cat1 at inm.mod.uk
*****************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Jenny Schroeder
Sent: 12 January 2007 14:21
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: [DCRM-L] Pagination and Note Questions
I am been cataloging individual medical theses from the University of
Edinburgh that are bound together by year.
I recently came across a thesis that consists of two non-complete theses
with the same title but different authors bound together as if they were
one complete thesis.
My questions are:
How would I record pagination since I actually have two different and
non-complete theses (pages 19-22 and pages 9-21)?
-- Should it be: [2] leaves, p. 19-22, p. 9-21.
How would I document the signatures since I have two different
non-complete theses bound as if they are one thesis?
-- I think I would not attempt to record the signatures since they
are so confusing and out of order.
How would I document a note explaining what the error is and what this
bound thesis consists of (two non-complete theses)?
-- Should it be: Mis-bound thesis consists of p. 19-22 of Lachlan
John Cameron's thesis Dissertatio medica inauguralis de enteritide ;
Missing p. 1-8.
Thanks so much,
Jenny Schroeder
Ebling Health Sciences Library
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Information Resources Unit
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list