[DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

[Deborah J. Leslie]

One of the things that came up in conversation was that we knew it when
we saw it, but couldn't find a non-derogatory name for it. "Polemical"
isn't necessarily derogatory, while "Prejudice" is. 

 

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Dooley,Jackie
Sent: Friday, 19 June, 2009 10:29
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

 

Strikes me as equally subjective-not to mention vague, since it could
include stuff with a much softer point of view than e.g. a John Birch or
KKK pub that is patently prejudicial to a particular group. -Jackie

On 6/19/09 7:16 AM, "Deborah Leslie" <djleslie at folger.edu> wrote:

I just had an epiphany. Some of you remember discussions held a few
years ago about the problem with the genre term "Literature of
prejudice," which violates the cataloger's ethic of labelling (works,
people) in a way they would not name themselves. But it is useful to
have a term in the hierarchy to collocate this kind of literature.
 
How about "Polemical literature"?
 
___________________________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., s.E., Washington, D.C. 20003
202.675-0369 (phone) 202.675-0328 (fax)
djleslie at folger.edu  www.folger.edu



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20090619/e7c33e42/attachment.htm