[DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement

John Lancaster jlancaster at amherst.edu
Tue Nov 24 12:25:25 MST 2009


Is this a single gathering of 10 leaves?  If so, I would record it as [par.]^10 with a statement of the actual signings. (^10 = superscript 10; this e-mail system does not offer superscripts)

________________________________

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu on behalf of silvanan at mptek.net
Sent: Tue 11/24/2009 2:08 PM
To: EXLIBRIS-L at LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU; DCRM-L
Subject: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement



Hi there,
What would be the best way to notate the following prelim. sequence:
1st leaf (t.p.) unsigned, [par.], [par.]1, [par.]2, [par.]3 [par.]4,
[par.]5, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf
followed by A, A2 ... etc.    

Thanks,
Silvana



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3613 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20091124/e544db26/attachment.bin 


More information about the DCRM-L mailing list