[DCRM-L] prospectuses
Schneider, Nina
nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu
Mon Sep 14 12:56:15 MDT 2009
I would vote for the 6xx, since it's about the publication.
Nina
________________________________
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 3:59 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: [DCRM-L] prospectuses
I'm cataloging a prospectus. Does it make more sense to put the
name/title tracing as a 600 or a 700? I keep wavering, and I've seen it
done both ways. The prospectus is about the publication, just as the
publication is a related work to the prospectus. Putting it in both
seems like overkill.
Thanks for any discussion; perhaps we can establish an informal
convention.
__________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
RBMS Chair 2009-2010 | Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., S.E. | Washington, D.C. 20003 | 202.675-0369
djleslie at folger.edu | http://www.folger.edu <http://www.folger.edu/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20090914/0f6fcbd2/attachment.htm
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list