[DCRM-L] Fwd: FW: Duplicate detection question

Robert Maxwell robert_maxwell at byu.edu
Thu Dec 2 13:09:05 MST 2010


My goodness, it would be nice to know what the magic words are on the table ... Anybody have any idea how to access this table?

Robert L. Maxwell
Head, Special Collections and Formats Catalog Dept.
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Noble, Richard
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:33 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: [DCRM-L] Fwd: FW: Duplicate detection question

Heads up on defensive cataloging: Apparently the merge blocking depends on a table of specific phrases, etc. If the contents of the 250 don't match anything in the table, the record is susceptible to merging.

RICHARD NOBLE : RARE BOOKS CATALOGER : JOHN HAY LIBRARY : BROWN UNIVERSITY
PROVIDENCE, RI 02912 : 401-863-1187/FAX 863-3384 : RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU<mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mizer, Samuel Arnold <samuel_mizer at brown.edu<mailto:samuel_mizer at brown.edu>>
Date: Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:46 PM
Subject: Fwd: FW: Duplicate detection question
To: "Banush, David" <david_banush at brown.edu<mailto:david_banush at brown.edu>>, Catherine Busselen <catherine_busselen at brown.edu<mailto:catherine_busselen at brown.edu>>, Richard Noble <richard_noble at brown.edu<mailto:richard_noble at brown.edu>>


A peek into the realm of DDR:
Forwarded conversation
Subject: Duplicate detection question
------------------------

From: Yealy, Gretchen <gretchen_yealy at brown.edu<mailto:gretchen_yealy at brown.edu>>
Date: Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM
To: whitacrc at oclc.org<mailto:whitacrc at oclc.org>
Cc: Sam Mizer <Samuel_Mizer at brown.edu<mailto:Samuel_Mizer at brown.edu>>


Hi Cynthia,

We have a question about the duplicate detection software.  We understood from the webinar that entering a 250 field would probably protect a record from being merged.  We recently received a large collection of "advance reading copies" which we are cataloging as originals with 250 fields, usually deriving from an existing record for the published form of the book.  Examples:

#673622653
#682903749

Today while working on our November ftp of records from our catalog to OCLC, I noticed that at least 2 of these have now been merged with the published copy and the OCLC # we generated has been moved to MARC 019.  Examples:

#166872410
#61881209

Any idea why some of these are merging and others not?  Should we still be treating this type of material as original?  The 250 statements vary somewhat (Advance reader's ed, Advance uncorr. proof).  Is there another field we should be using to indicate that this type of material should not merge?

Thanks!

Gretchen Yealy
Brown University Library


----------
From: Yealy, Gretchen <gretchen_yealy at brown.edu<mailto:gretchen_yealy at brown.edu>>
Date: Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:24 PM
To: "Griffith,Shanna" <griffits at oclc.org<mailto:griffits at oclc.org>>
Cc: Sam Mizer <Samuel_Mizer at brown.edu<mailto:Samuel_Mizer at brown.edu>>


Hi Shanna,

Thanks for your quick fix on these.  Here is another example of the 250 field we are entering for this project:

250  Advance reading copy

Gretchen

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Griffith,Shanna <griffits at oclc.org<mailto:griffits at oclc.org>> wrote:
Hi, Gretchen,

Your understanding from the webinar is correct.  The edition statements you added to the records should have been enough to prevent them from being merged, and I have had your records recovered.

Your message allowed us to identify another record that was also incorrectly merged to LC's record #166872410.  I have merged RBN record #682917829 with #213384596, which also represents the Advance reading copy for the title "Airman".

Our DDR team has added these specific edition statements to the tables so that records with this type of edition statement are no longer merged.

Thank you for bringing these to our attention.  It is feedback such as this that allows us to better refine the matching algorithms used in the DDR process.

Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance.

Thank you,
Shanna

Shanna Griffith
Quality Control Section
OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
6565 Kilgour Place
Dublin, OH 43017-3395
The world's libraries. Connected.


From: Yealy, Gretchen [mailto:gretchen_yealy at brown.edu<mailto:gretchen_yealy at brown.edu>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Whitacre,Cynthia
Cc: Sam Mizer
Subject: Duplicate detection question




--

________________________________________

Samuel A. Mizer
Department Co-Leader, Technical Services
Brown University Library
Providence, RI 02912
E-Mail: Samuel_Mizer at Brown.edu
Phone: 401-863-3640  Fax: 401-863-1272


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20101202/f3212916/attachment.htm 


More information about the DCRM-L mailing list