[DCRM-L] Lemniscate

[Laurence Creider]

I would opt for transcribing lemniscate as M for a couple of reasons:

1) The "Replace symbols ..." language would apply just as much to 
C-I-Backward C as to the lemniscate, and that description is just plain 
awkward.

2) "Lemniscate" is not a common term.  I am undoubtedly prejudiced by the
    fact that I had to look up the term ,but it seems to me that using
    "lemniscate" in a catalog record is not very user-friendly.

This was written before I received Stephen's message.  I agree with his 
points.

Larry
--
Laurence S. Creider
Special Collections Librarian
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM  88003
Work: 575-646-7227
Fax: 575-646-7477
lcreider at lib.nmsu.edu

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Erin Blake wrote:

> Turns out Ellen Cordes' question about lemniscate (mathematical symbol for infinity that looks like a sideways 8) used instead of "M" in Roman numeral dates needs more discussion. There's agreement that it should be added to the chart in G2, but not about how to transcribe it.
>
> For background on lemniscate as "M", go to http://www2.inetdirect.net/~charta/Roman_numerals.html and scroll down to "Use of the Apostrophus."
>
> Should a lemniscate be transcribed as "M" or as "[lemniscate]"?
>
> Because DCRM calls for transcribing CI[backwards C] as "M", and a 
> lemniscate is another way to represent the shape of CI[backwards C], I 
> assumed it would be transcribed "M" (and you could make a note that a 
> lemniscate is used). [Note: an explanation for transcribing CI[backwards 
> C] as M can be found in the DCRM-L archives at 
> https://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/2006-January/000980.html 
> where Deborah J. Leslie writes "there there is an historical 
> relationship between the apostrophic and modern forms of M (CI-backwards 
> C) and D (I-backwards C). This provides us with strong support in the 
> decision to transcribe apostrophic Roman numerals in their modern Roman 
> equivalents."]
>
> However, it could also be a case of "replace symbols or other matter 
> that cannot be reproduced using available typographical facilities with 
> a cataloger's description in square brackets" so the date field would 
> read, for example, "[lemniscate]DLXVII [1567]"
>
> Your input is needed!
>
> Thanks,
>
>   EB.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: DCRM Revision Group List
> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Lemniscate
>
> It is no more obscure than some of the Latin symbols. Add it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Manon Theroux
> Sent: Tuesday, 08 February, 2011 10:59
> To: DCRM Revision Group List
> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Lemniscate
>
> Hi Erin,
>
> I don't recall it ever coming up in discussions, so I think it wasn't
> a deliberate omission.
>
> I'd vote for adding it to the chart!
>
> Manon
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Cordes, Ellen <ellen.cordes at yale.edu> wrote:
>> DCRM(B-S) editors and others,
>>
>>
>>
>> I ran across a couple of prints published in Rome in the 16th century that
>> used the lemniscate in place of the M to represent 1000 in the date.
>> [Printers who used this convention used the number 8 sideways, apparently,
>> though I have never actually seen it.]   It seems like something that (B) or
>> (S) would have included in the chart in G2, but did not.  The question came
>> up in the context of reviewing the chart in G2 for DCRM(G).
>>
>>
>>
>> There's an interesting brief description of the use of lemniscates at
>> http://www2.inetdirect.net/~charta/Roman_numerals.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Was this too obscure to include in G2 in the (B) and (S) modules?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ellen R. Cordes
>>
>> Head of Technical Services
>>
>> The Lewis Walpole Library
>>
>> Yale University
>> P.O. Box 1408
>> Farmington, CT 06034
>>
>>
>>
>> Street Address (for FedEx, UPS, etc.):
>>
>>
>>
>> 154 Main Street
>>
>> Farmington, CT 06032
>>
>>
>>
>> Telephone: 860 677-2140
>>
>> Fax: 860 677-6369
>>
>>
>