[DCRM-L] FW: [PCCLIST] Relationship Designator TG Report Open for Comment

[Noble, Richard]

Innocent (i.e. uninformed) question: Is the list of terms in C.5
consciously and prescriptively limited vis-à-vis our existing vocabulary?
Or do the many remaining terms await the writing of scope notes to make
them acceptable under PCC guidelines?

RICHARD NOBLE : RARE BOOKS CATALOGER : JOHN HAY LIBRARY : BROWN UNIVERSITY
PROVIDENCE, RI 02912 : 401-863-1187/FAX 863-3384 : RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU



On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Auyong, Dorothy <dauyong at huntington.org>wrote:

> Worth perusing and adding the 2 cents from the Rare Books Community I
> think.****
>
> ** **
>
> Dorothy Auyong****
>
> Principal Rare Book Cataloger****
>
> Huntington Library****
>
> dauyong at huntington.org****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:
> PCCLIST at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV] *On Behalf Of *Philip Schreur
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:48 AM
> *To:* PCCLIST at LISTSERV.LOC.GOV
> *Subject:* [PCCLIST] Relationship Designator TG Report Open for Comment***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> All,****
>
> I am extremely pleased to announce that the final report of the
> Relationship Designator Task Group is now available on the PCC website:***
> *
>
> Relationship Designator TG Report
>
> http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/RDA%20Task%20groups%20and%20charges/PCC-Relat-Desig-TG-report.rtf
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> The group was chaired by Naun Chew and was asked to provide a policy
> statement and guidelines for providing relationship designators in PCC RDA
> bibliographic records. In particular, they were asked to:****
>
> 1.     Prepare a policy recommendation and supporting PCC guidelines to
> describe when and how to provide relationship designators in bibliographic
> records, and for any related changes in authority records.****
>
> 2.      Provide recommendations and guidance on what PCC catalogers should
> do when a needed term is not listed in the applicable RDA appendix.****
>
> 3.     Frame the guidelines within a definition and description of the
> problem so that both the concept and the implementation details will be
> understood by the PCC and broader professional community****
>
> 4.     Recommend an implementation strategy and timetable for these
> guidelines.****
>
> The report has made a number of excellent recommendations.  Please read
> the document carefully, we are very much interested in your comments.  The
> comment period will be open until the end of this month (Dec. 31st) and
> comments can be directed to SurveyMonkey:https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/TZ6DZX5.
> All the best.
>
> Philip
> **
> ******
>
> -- ****
>
> Philip E. Schreur****
>
> Head, Metadata Department****
>
> Chair, Program for Cooperative Cataloging****
>
> Stanford University****
>
> 650-723-2454****
>
> 650-725-1120 (fax)****
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20121205/ece5f645/attachment.htm>