[DCRM-L] Forgeries and fakes

[Ryan Hildebrand]

Hi Deborah,

The proposed SN for Literary hoaxes, which we will vote on at Annual, is: Use for writings that are forged or fabricated with the intent to deceive. Glad to have another exemplar! -Ryan



From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:39 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Forgeries and fakes

Oh, of course! Yes.

What's the status of the scope note for Literary hoaxes? There is no scope note online, and the discussion on pbworks is inconclusive.

http://rbmsthesauri.pbworks.com/w/page/5857599/Literary%20hoaxes%20SN

Thanks,
Deborah

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu> | 202.675-0369 | www.folger.edu<http://www.folger.edu>

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Will Evans
Sent: Saturday, 13 April, 2013 09:32
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Forgeries and fakes

Literary hoaxes?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Will Evans
Chief Rare Materials Catalog Librarian
Library of the Boston Athenaeum
10 1/2 Beacon Street
Boston, MA   02108

Tel:  617-227-0270 ext. 224
Fax: 617-227-5266
www.bostonathenaeum.org<http://www.bostonathenaeum.org/>




From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu>] On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 5:30 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: [DCRM-L] Forgeries and fakes

I'm cataloging the 1855 edition of Shakespeare's works edited by J. Payne Collier, in which he gives the readings according to a "newly-discovered" emended copy of the second folio, which later came out that he himself emended in a forged 17c hand.

I'm looking at the controlled vocabulary for fakery in the printing & publishing vocabulary. Neither "fakes" nor "forgeries" has a scope note. http://www.rbms.info/committees/bibliographic_standards/controlled_vocabularies/printing-publishing/tr294.htm

What do I have? The publication isn't itself a forgery--that would be the copy of the 2nd folio that Collier marked up. Do I have a "fake"?

Information, advice, and musings aloud welcome.

Thanks,
Deborah

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library | 201 East Capitol St., S.E. | Washington, D.C. 20003 | djleslie at folger.edu<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu> | 202.675-0369 | http://www.folger.edu<http://www.folger.edu/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20130415/85227bd5/attachment.html>