[DCRM-L] itoamc

[O'Keefe, Doris N.]

I certainly hope not since we've been using it as our chief controlled
vocabulary for occupations in NARs. But I'd be interested in a
definitive answer too.
 

Doris O'Keefe 
Senior Cataloger for Rare Books 
American Antiquarian Society 
185 Salisbury Street 
Worcester, Mass. 01609 

phone: (508) 471-2145 
e-mail: dokeefe at mwa.org 
website/online catalog: http://www.americanantiquarian.org
<http://www.americanantiquarian.org/>  
AAS is now blogging at http://pastispresent.org
<http://pastispresent.org/>  
And on Facebook at http://facebook.com/American.Antiquarian 

 

________________________________

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 4:18 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: [DCRM-L] itoamc



I came across the source code itoamc in an RDA NAR: Index terms for
occupations in archival and manuscript collections (Washington, DC:
Library of Congress, Manuscript Division). The LC web site listing
Occupation term source
codes--http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/occupation.html--has no
hyperlink to that list. Is it obsolete?

 

Thanks,

Deborah

 

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Folger Shakespeare Library | 201 East
Capitol St., S.E. | Washington, D.C. 20003 | djleslie at folger.edu
<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu>  | 202.675-0369 | http://www.folger.edu
<http://www.folger.edu/>   

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20131007/a50aad87/attachment.html>