[DCRM-L] To bracket or not in cataloging manuscripts

[Erin Blake]

I think one of the issues that was giving some people pause was that it can be desireable to describe a manuscript that presents itself as a book the same way that a book is described, so not even having the option of Area 2 for an edition statement was a problem. Deborah mentioned in person that DCRM(B) could add an appendix on using DCRM(B) to catalog manuscripts.

I imagine this would be useful for typescripts such as screenplays, which present themselves formally and are mechanically reproduced. Though unpublished, they’re circulated by a corporate distributor. For example, you could end up with something like:
As you like it by William Shakespeare [manuscript] / screenplay by Kenneth Branagh.
Production draft.
[S.l.] : HBO Films & Shakespeare Film Company, 14/03/05.

The appendix would be analogous to DCRM(S)’s projected appendix on manuscript serials, and DCRM(G)’s appendix on cataloging material with title pages as graphic material rather than as books.

Erin.


----------------
Erin C. Blake, Ph.D.  |  Curator of Art & Special Collections  |  Folger Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC, 20009  |  eblake at folger.edu  |  office tel. 202-675-0323  |  fax 202-675-0328  |  www.folger.edu


________________________________
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] on behalf of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 2:57 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: [DCRM-L] To bracket or not in cataloging manuscripts

There has been a little discussion on the DCRM Steering Group (DSG) wiki about the DCRM(MSS) statement on using bracketing devised titles in manuscripts, but we were expecting a lot more, given that this is an important topic with far-reaching consequences for all the constituent manuals. It looks like our plan to carry out the discussion on the wiki has inhibited the kind of discussion and debate the issue deserves. The three commenters will re-post here on DCRM-L to kick off the discussion in what is, now that I think about it, quite more appropriate venue for community-wide discussions.

Thanks,
Deborah

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu> | 202.675-0369 | www.folger.edu

From: Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, 14 August, 2013 14:55
To: Deborah J. Leslie; Elizabeth O'Keefe <eokeefe at morganlibrary.org>; Erin Blake; Francis Lapka <francis.lapka at yale.edu>; John Attig <jxa16 at psu.edu>; Manon Theroux <manon.theroux at gmail.com>; Nancy Lorimer <nlorimer at stanford.edu>; Randal Brandt <rbrandt at library.berkeley.edu>
Subject: To bracket or not in cataloging manuscripts

Dear DCRM-L Community,

Some months ago, Manon Théroux put together a chart on how the different DCRM manuals treat manuscript material, which revealed a number of important differences between the manuals, especially in comparison to DCRM(MSS). The most prominent is whether to use square brackets when supplying text in a transcription field (areas 1, 2, 4, and 6). Traditionally, catalogs of manuscripts and archival collections do not bracket supplied information. Since a basic principle of DCRM construction is not to deviate from AACR2 unless there's a rare material reason to depart, or from the already-published DCRM manuals unless there's a format-specific reason to depart, the DCRM Steering Group asked the DCRM(MSS) editorial group to justify the format-specific reason for departing from bracketing in transcription fields.

For the origins of this discussion, see http://dcrmsteeringgroup.pbworks.com/w/page/66689534/Discussion%20topic%3A%20Manuscripts%20across%20DCRM
For the DCRM(MSS) response, see http://dcrmsteeringgroup.pbworks.com/w/page/68229123/Discussion%20topic%3A%20Manuscript%20Bracketing

Anyone may view the contents of the DCRM Steering Group workspace; those wishing to comment on the pages or request automatic notifications when the workspace has been changed will please to follow the request link on the PBworks workspace.

The Steering Group and the DCRM(MSS) editorial group would like as much discussion from the larger community as possible before proceeding. Your comments are encouraged.

Deborah J. Leslie
Convenor, DCRM Steering Group



Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Folger Shakespeare Library | 201 East Capitol St., S.E. | Washington, D.C. 20003 | djleslie at folger.edu<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu> | 202.675-0369 | http://www.folger.edu<http://www.folger.edu/>