[DCRM-L] 007 field for rare materials

[Dooley,Jackie]

Jumping onto the option 2 bandwagon. -Jackie

From: <Schneider>, Nina Schneider <nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu<mailto:nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu>>
Reply-To: DCRM-L <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>>
Date: Thursday, 13March, 2014 9:50 AM
To: DCRM-L <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>>
Cc: Becky Culbertson <rculbertson at ucsd.edu<mailto:rculbertson at ucsd.edu>>
Subject: [DCRM-L] 007 field for rare materials

Colleagues

I've only received a handful of comments about this (see my email from 2/28/2014). Opinion is split between requiring the 007 for all materials and only requiring 007 for non-monographic materials.  Since not everyone weighed in, how about a straw poll?

Option 1: 007 should be required for all rare materials regardless of format
Option 2: 007 should not be required for rare monographs

A quick response will be much appreciated.

Thanks

Nina

+---------------
Nina M. Schneider
Chair, RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee

Head Cataloger
William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
2520 Cimarron Street
Los Angeles, CA  90018
(323) 731-8529

nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu<mailto:nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu>
http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/clarklib/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20140313/38350fa3/attachment.html>