[DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)

Deborah J. Leslie DJLeslie at FOLGER.edu
Sat Aug 29 08:42:14 MDT 2015


I don't have the sense that they recommend it just yet, but I do hope that the group chosen to work with OCLC will explore it. (That's what I meant to say.)

Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu | 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www. folger.edu

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Allison Jai O'Dell
Sent: Saturday, 29 August 2015 07:39
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)

Making use of the $5 seems like the most logical solution to me.  And if my recollection is correct, this is the solution that OCLC recommends?


Allison


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Deborah J. Leslie <DJLeslie at folger.edu<mailto:DJLeslie at folger.edu>> wrote:

To everyone: Should we explore expanding the use of 500 ‡5 and other non-local note fields for our local data?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20150829/f3cfc64b/attachment.html>


More information about the DCRM-L mailing list