[DCRM-L] DCRM(M) questions

[Fell, Todd]

Our (Cartographics) exact note in the preface:

"Current information on the relationship between DCRM and RDA can be found on the RBMS website at: http://www.rbms.info/dcrm/rda."

I also agree with Nina that Music and Cartographics should say the same as such and to keep it as generic as possible.

Todd

-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Laurence S. Creider
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 4:11 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Cc: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] DCRM(M) questions

What the note says is to consult the particular page for details.  Nancy has probably outlined what those instructions should be for DCRM(M). Those should probably be included in the web page (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rbms.info_dcrm_rda_&d=AwIDAw&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=Np9Dv-N85TxuwGXDqbzvM-I_B1c6fwLXrzKWWE4fD3I&m=0MU4WTskB66a5Luk7ldhznKnZjx9MDNQUd0zjlbwQZU&s=oozqur-6Pq-ovVsLAL-Eb7GrR7AmZjg4cGvQ3SDKrSI&e= ) giving instructions on what to do with the different modules.
FWIW, I agree with Nina, that we should to have the note until such time as a DCRM compliant with RDA has been finshed. RDA is still a moving target, and there will be times when DCRM(M,B,S,C,G), and the BSR are out of sync.

Larry

P.S. I do think we need to get rid of any notion that RDA is an ending point.  We will continue to have to respond to newer and probably more foreign ways of packaging the information our patrons need.


--
Laurence S. Creider
Head, Archives and Special Collections Dept.
University Library
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM  88003
Work: 575-646-4756
Fax: 575-646-7477
lcreider at lib.nmsu.edu

On Mon, June 8, 2015 1:57 pm, Schneider, Nina wrote:
> The Music and Cartographics modules should be parallel, I think. 
> Perhaps the editors of DCRMC could pipe in here. Personally (and only 
> personally) I think we should leave it fairly generic as RDA-ized DCRM 
> is still a moving target.
>
>
> Nina
>
>
> +----------
> Nina Schneider
> Head Cataloger
> William Andrews Clark Memorial Library University of California, Los 
> Angeles
> 2520 Cimarron Street
> Los Angeles, CA  90018
>
> (323) 731-8529
> nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.humnet.ucla.ed
> u_humnet_clarklib_&d=AwIDAw&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=Np9Dv-N85TxuwGX
> DqbzvM-I_B1c6fwLXrzKWWE4fD3I&m=0MU4WTskB66a5Luk7ldhznKnZjx9MDNQUd0zjlb
> wQZU&s=qx1zYY4zDqxqDYfoHwLYOQcYbO4Kas5ugMWa50DdtN4&e=
> ________________________________
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> on 
> behalf of Nancy Lorimer <nlorimer at stanford.edu>
> Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 12:42 PM
> To: DCRM Revision Group List
> Subject: [DCRM-L] DCRM(M) questions
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a week left to be sure, but I haven't received any real 
> feedback as yet. I thought I might start things going by addressing my 
> first general question, based on the following comment from the 
> CC:DA/MLA task force.
>
>
> DCRM(M) and RDA:
>
> It is our understanding that as of January 1, 2015, BIBCO catalogers 
> are no longer allowed to use a nonRDA compliant standard for new 
> BIBCOauthenticated cataloging.  The BSRs for individual material 
> types have been combined into a single PCC RDA BIBCO Standard Record 
> (BSR) Metadata Application Profile4 , with guidelines that provide for 
> the combination of RDA and the other published DCRM modules.
>
> We are glad to learn that rare music provisions have already been 
> included in the BSR, and that the description conventions code dcrmm 
> has been established in advance of the publication of DCRM(M). It is 
> our understanding that BIBCOauthenticated records can thus be coded 
> as both RDA and DCRM(M) compliant, as is the case with the other 
> published DCRM modules, and that this option is available for nonBIBCO records as well.
> While this was not the case at the time of publication of the other 
> modules, the DCRM(M) text has the opportunity to indicate that 
> catalogers will have these options. Therefore we recommend that this 
> situation be discussed with the PCC Standing Committee on Standards, 
> and suggest further clarification in DCRM(M) instructions on the 
> possible combination of rules and conventions. This impacts the 
> Introduction (specifically II.1? X.1.3? footnote 4), Appendix A, and Appendix B1.3.
>
> My question. We have the note agreed upon when the Graphics volume was
> published: "The relationship between the DCRM manuals and RDA is evolving.
> Current guidelines and other information can be found on the RBMS 
> website at 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rbms.info_committees_bibliographic-5Fstandards_dcrm_rda_dcrm-2Drda-2Dhtml&d=AwIDAw&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=Np9Dv-N85TxuwGXDqbzvM-I_B1c6fwLXrzKWWE4fD3I&m=0MU4WTskB66a5Luk7ldhznKnZjx9MDNQUd0zjlbwQZU&s=4plWUznMQuYJwryeu27A8wuohLNpIxA2xcjR3EtnVI0&e= >."
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rbms.info_committ
> ees_bibliographic-5Fstandards_dcrm_rda_dcrm-2Drda-2Dhtml&d=AwIDAw&c=-d
> g2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=Np9Dv-N85TxuwGXDqbzvM-I_B1c6fwLXrzKWWE4fD3I&m=0
> MU4WTskB66a5Luk7ldhznKnZjx9MDNQUd0zjlbwQZU&s=4plWUznMQuYJwryeu27A8wuoh
> LNpIxA2xcjR3EtnVI0&e= >
>
> Should we keep this or consider a change as suggested above? Whichever 
> way, I will note that the link does not work anymore. It should 
> be:http://rbms.info/dcrm/rda/
>
> thanks
> Nancy
>
> --
> Nancy Lorimer
> Head, Metadata Dept
> Stanford University Libraries
> nlorimer at stanford.edu<mailto:nlorimer at stanford.edu>
> 650-725-8819
>