[DCRM-L] FW: [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] Ligatus thesaurus [Was "Untrimmed Edges"]

[Manon Theroux]

Below is the MARC Technical Notice sent out last April. It has "lobt" not
"kobt" as the new code added to the Genre/Form Code and Term Source Codes
list for the Language of Bindings Thesaurus, so I think the web page just
has a typo.
https://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/genre-form.html

The 7 new codes for the RBMS Controlled Vocabularies were added to the
Standard Identifier Source Codes list (not the Genre/Form Code and Term
Source Codes list). They are designed for use in the 024 $2 in bib and
authority records, not the 655 field. I'm not sure what led them to be
established. I did wonder when I saw the Technical Notice last April though.
https://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/standard-identifier.html

The "old" codes for the RBMS controlled vocabularies (for use in the 655
field) still exist in the Genre/Form Code and Term Source Codes list.

-Manon

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: account for net dev and marc <ndmso at loc.gov>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:10 PM
Subject: [MARC] Technical Notice (April 08, 2016)
To: MARC at listserv.loc.gov


TECHNICAL NOTICE (April 08, 2016)
Additions to Source Codes for Vocabularies, Rules, and Schemes

Network Development and MARC Standards Office
Library of Congress

The source codes listed below have been recently approved. The codes will
be added to the applicable Source Codes for Vocabularies, Rules, and
Schemes lists. See the specific source code lists for current usage in
MARC fields and MODS/MADS elements.

The codes should not be used in exchange records until 60 days after the
date of this notice to provide implementers time to include newly-defined
codes in any validation tables.


Curriculum Objective Term and Code Source Codes
The following source code has been added to the Curriculum Objective Term
and Code Source Codes list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.

Addition:
udir - Norwegian Curriculum (Utdanningsdirektoratet (Udir)/The Norwegian
Directorate for Education and Training)


Description Convention Source Codes
The following source code has been added to the Description Convention
Source Codes list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.

Addition:
lcmpt - Library of Congress Medium of Performance Thesaurus for Music
(LCMPT) (Washington, DC: Library of Congress)
Note: This code was previously defined for use in Musical Instrumentation
and Voice Code Source Codes. Usage has been expanded to Standard
Identifier Source Codes.


Genre/Form Code and Term Source Codes
The following source code has been added to the Genre/Form Code and Term
Source Codes list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.

Addition:
lobt - Language of Bindings Thesaurus (London: University of Arts)


Standard Identifier Source Codes
The following source code has been added to the Standard Identifier Source
Codes list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.

Additions:
bfi - BFI - British Film Institute

fast - FAST - Faceted Application of Subject Terminology
Note: This code was previously defined for use in Subject Heading and Term
Source Codes. Usage has been expanded to Standard Identifier Source Codes.

isbnre - ISBN (International Standard Book Number) registrant element
Note: Refers to the part of the ISBN number that is stable for a
publisher's publications (the registrant element).

isil - ISIL (International Standard Identifier for Libraries and Related
Organizations)

rbmsbt - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Binding Terms (Rare Books and
Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research Libraries)

rbmsgt - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Genre Terms (Rare Books and
Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research Libraries)

rbmspe - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Provenance Evidence (Rare Books and
Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research Libraries)

rbmsppe - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Printing and Publishing Evidence
(Rare Books and Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research
Libraries)

rbmspt - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Paper Terms (Rare Books and
Manuscripts Section Association, of College & Research Libraries)

rbmsrd - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Relationship Designators (Rare
Books and Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research
Libraries)

rbmste - RBMS Controlled Vocabularies: Type Evidence (Rare Books and
Manuscripts Section, Association of College & Research Libraries)

scholaru - Scholar Universe


Subject Heading and Term Source Codes
The following source code has been added to the Subject Heading and Term
Source Codes list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.

Addition:
bokbas - Bokbasen


The Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office
provides information about existing and newly assigned MARC codes on its
Web site (www.loc.gov/marc/) as well as notices such as these to
subscribers to its MARC listserv (marc at loc.gov).


-----------------------------------------------
Network Development and MARC Standards Office
101 Independence Ave., S.E.
Washington, DC 20540-4402 U.S.A.
TEL: +1-202-707-6237
FAX: +1-202-707-0115
NET: ndmso at loc.gov
-----------------------------------------------


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Schneider, Nina <
nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu> wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> I just had a look at this list and noticed the RBMS thesaurus/CV codes
> have also changed. Did I miss an announcement?
>
>
>
> Nina
>
>
>
>
>
> +---------------
>
> Nina M. Schneider
>
> Chair, RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee
>
>
>
> Rare Books Librarian
>
> William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
>
> 2520 Cimarron Street
>
> Los Angeles, CA  90018
>
> (323) 731-8529
>
>
>
> nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu
>
> http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/clarklib/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Matthew C. Haugen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2016 8:02 AM
> *To:* DCRM Users' Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [DCRM-L] FW: [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] Ligatus
> thesaurus [Was "Untrimmed Edges"]
>
>
>
> Richard, Thank you for the suggestion. I queried them just now, and will
> let the list know what I hear.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Noble, Richard <richard_noble at brown.edu>
> wrote:
>
> Matt-
>
>
>
> Did you query the MARC Standards Office about "kobt"? It looks very much
> like a typo from whatever source that found its way into the two documents.
> If it is, then it should be corrected asap, before it finds its way into
> too many records.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
>
> BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
>
> <Richard_Noble at Br <RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Matthew C. Haugen <
> matthew.haugen at columbia.edu> wrote:
>
> All, Thanks for the feedback. I submitted a request for a new source code
> for the Language of Bindings Thesaurus to the MARC standards office on
> February 5. A new code was announced in the MARC Technical Notice on April
> 7, but it just came to my attention today:
> Genre/Form Code and Term Source Codes
>
> The following source code has been added to the Genre/Form Code and Term
> Source Codes <http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/genre-form.html>
> list for usage in appropriate fields and elements.
>
> Additions
>
>    - kobt - Language of Bindings Thesaurus (London: University of Arts)
>
> Sources:
> http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/tn160406src.html
>
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/genre-form.html
>
> This enables the use of the thesaurus in 655_7 $2 kobt
>
> I would have expected lobt, but both LOC documents do show kobt.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Carpenter, Jane <
> jfcarpenter at library.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> Nina, LOB = Language of Bindings (Ligatus)
>
> I believe it’s Jackie Shieh
>
> You’re right—Feb 15th is President’s Day!  (I didn’t realize….)  We’ll
> reschedule the CV meeting
>
> Thanks for pointing that out
>
> Jane
>
> *From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Schneider, Nina
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:23 PM
> *To:* DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [DCRM-L] FW: [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] Ligatus
> thesaurus [Was "Untrimmed Edges"]
>
>
>
> Sorry, Matt, for being dense. What’s LOB?
>
>
>
> Also, I went to an ALA reporting meeting at UCLA yesterday and one person
> reported on a meeting they attended (PCC at Large, I believe) in which
> expansion of fields beyond $0 (such as $0 for authorities, $w for works and
> $4 for bibliographic relationships) help with linking. I believe it’s a
> pilot of the URI Task Group (I think Jackie Shay – George Washington
> University -- gave the presentation at Midwinter).
>
>
>
> Nina
>
>
>
> *From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu
> <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu>] *On Behalf Of *Matthew C. Haugen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 10:05 AM
> *To:* Deborah J. Leslie
> *Cc:* DCRM Users' Group
> *Subject:* Re: [DCRM-L] FW: [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] Ligatus
> thesaurus [Was "Untrimmed Edges"]
>
>
>
> I am considering submitting a request for a new MARC genre/form code and
> term source code for the LOB database to enable use of the terms in 655 as
> with rbbin. Would others find this desirable? Has a request already been
> made, perhaps?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Deborah J. Leslie <DJLeslie at folger.edu>
> wrote:
>
> For those who don't studiously read ExLibris-L. This thesaurus has been a
> long time in preparation:
> http://www.arts.ac.uk/research/ual-research-centres/ligatus/
>
>
>
> Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu |
> 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www.
> folger.edu
>
>
>
> *From:* Nicholas Pickwoad [mailto:npickwoad at paston.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Friday, 08 May 2015 10:19
> *To:* exlibris-l at list.indiana.edu
> *Subject:* [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] Ligatus thesaurus [Was
> "Untrimmed Edges"]
>
>
>
> Dear Leslie,
>
>
>
> I have now at last got news. The thesaurus will be open to all in the week
> leading up to a conference we are putting on in London with CERL on 23 June
> (the poster is about to go out). The accompanying volume, *Coming to
> Terms: guidelines for the description of historical bindings* (120,000
> words and about 500 illustrations) is now with the designer and will be
> available later in the summer.
>
>
>
> All the best
>
>
>
> Nicholas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Professor Nicholas Pickwoad
>
> Ligatus Research Centre
>
> CCW Graduate School, University of the Arts London
>
> 16 John Islip Street
>
> London SW1P 4JU
>
>
>
> e-mail: npickwoad at paston.co.uk
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8 May 2015, at 15:12, "Deborah J. Leslie" <DJLeslie at FOLGER.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nicholas,
>
> Any word on when the Ligatus thesaurus will be available for general use?
>
> Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu |
> 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www.
> folger.edu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Pickwoad [mailto:npickwoad at paston.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, 08 May 2015 03:59
> To: exlibris-l at list.indiana.edu
> Subject: [Marketing Mail] Re: ["EXLIBRIS-L"] "Untrimmed Edges"
>
> Dear Andy Foster,
>
> I wrote this last night but had not sent it off before I saw Terry's
> response. We are largely in agreement, except over the use of the word
> 'trimmed', as Anglophone binders, of whom I am one, use the word 'cut' for
> the substantial removal of the edges of the leaves across a whole
> bookblock, while 'trim' has a sense in English of a much lighter cut than
> is usually seen on most books. We will include 'trim' as an alternative
> term for 'cut', and the community at large will decide which it prefers.
> These differences in terminology between the practitioners and the users
> are not uncommon. For most binders, cutting is done in a 'cutting' or
> 'laying press'; there is no piece of equipment called a 'trimming press'.
>
>
> My original message:
>
> We have tried to sort this out for the Ligatus thesaurus as follows: As
> the treatment of the individual edges of any bookblock can be different,
> you always need to make clear whether you are describing all or only one or
> two of the edges. Deckle (not deckled) edges will, as you indicate, appear
> on the bookblock edges according to how the sheet of handmade paper is
> folded, and will, under normal circumstances, be present on all three outer
> edges only on folio format books, and on the fore- and tail edges of
> quartos, etc. The term 'rough edges' is a somewhat archaic form of 'deckle
> edges' (it was used in the eighteenth century), but all such edges are
> 'uncut edges'. The term 'rough cut' is rather different and means the same
> as  the term 'rough trimmed' as in rough trimmed edges' (defined in the
> Ligatus thesaurus as:  "Uneven edges in which leaves or groups of leaves
> were trimmed, often by hand with shears, either before the book was sewn or
> after to remove the oversized leaves which would otherwise have projected
> from the edge of the bookblock. A rough-trimmed edge is therefore very
> different from one that is 'cut solid' with a plough or draw knife (or,
> more recently, a guillotine). Edges of both sorts can be found on the same
> bookblock"). Although the terms  'cutting' and 'trimming' have been used to
> mean the same things (cutting solid with a plough, etc.), we are suggesting
> that only the term 'cutting' is used for this, and 'trimming' be reserved
> for 'rough trimming', in the hopes of keeping the two different processes
> distinct.
>
> Bolts on the folded edges of leaves will be cut off by edge cutting (or
> indeed to some extent by rough trimming) and the textblock thus 'opened',
> but bolts can be 'opened' individually without cutting the edge of the
> bookblock, leaving any deckle edges intact.
>
> Nicholas Pickwoad
>
>
> On 7 May 2015, at 20:14, Milton & Hubble Books <andy at miltonandhubble.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello List:
>
> I'm pondering the terms for describing edges in fine press books with hand
> made paper.
>
> Should the term "Deckled Edges " or "Rough Edges"  be used only when such
> edges are present Head, Fore, and Tail - that is ALL EDGES?    What if such
> Rough Edges should remain on the sheet edge, but appear in the book
> together with trimmed edges - sometimes on the Head edge, sometimes on the
> Fore Edge, or sometimes on more than one edge, as folding would have it?
>
> Should the term "Untrimmed Edges" be a safe catch-all phrase, encompassing
> all possibilities including unopened edges as well as these cases of
> scattered deckled edges?
>
> Thank you for your kind assistance!
>
> Andy Foster
> Milton and Hubble Books
> Pasadena, California
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Matthew C. Haugen
> Rare Book Cataloger
> 102 Butler Library
> Columbia University Libraries
> E-mail: matthew.haugen at columbia.edu
> Phone: 212-851-2451
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Matthew C. Haugen
> Rare Book Cataloger
> 102 Butler Library
> Columbia University Libraries
> E-mail: matthew.haugen at columbia.edu
> Phone: 212-851-2451
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Matthew C. Haugen
> Rare Book Cataloger
> 102 Butler Library
> Columbia University Libraries
> E-mail: matthew.haugen at columbia.edu
> Phone: 212-851-2451
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20160622/a7f2f4a5/attachment-0001.html>