[DCRM-L] Transcription of "VV" in engraved text: DCRM(B/G) and RBMS PS

[Erin Blake]

Does it matter if the "VV" you're transcribing is letterpress or not? DCRM(B) makes no distinction, but DCRM(G) specifies that this applies when pieces of type are used to approximate other letters.

Under DCRM, it doesn't make a difference: if an artist or printmaker deliberately drew or engraved two v's to make a visual joke about a w (for example), it would be transcribed as two v's because you transcribe what you see. But the RBMS PS Draft says the drawn or engraved vv would have to be transcribed as w.


  *   DCRM(B) 0G7.2 says: Transcribe two letters used to approximate a third letter as the intended letter. However, transcribe vv as vv


  *   DCRM(G) 0G7.3 says: Transcribe two letters of type used to approximate a third letter as the intended letter. However, transcribe letterpress vv as vv


  *   RBMS PS Draft 2017-12-13 says: Transcribe characters used to approximate a different character (e.g., when VV and vv letterforms have been used to represent the single letter W or w) as the intended character

I can't think of an example where an engraved VV is means as a "W" (just examples where engraved majuscule VV would be converted to miniscule vu, as in this title page (book only has an engraved title page): http://librarymedia.nga.gov/library/1024/352231/352231_002_cor.jpg

Erin.

________

Erin C. Blake, Ph.D.  |  Head of Collection Information Services  |  Folger Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC, 20003  |  eblake at folger.edu<mailto:eblake at folger.edu>  |  office tel. +1 202-675-0323


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20171215/c0cabfc7/attachment.html>