[DCRM-L] Puzzled by LC note re Hain 1522 / Pellechet 1084

[John Lancaster]

Here, if the listserv allows, is a screen shot of the line in question, 
from the BSB copy:



> Noble, Richard <mailto:richard_noble at brown.edu>
> January 7, 2017 at 5:59 PM
> Many thanks to John, and for the correction--by that time of day on a 
> Friday it might better be called Fried-Day.
>
> I've heard from the cataloger in question--collaboration is in 
> progress. As to "spes", I'll look again, but I checked the text in a 
> modern edition, and the word /is/ "speciem". Perhaps a typo? Foul case 
> error? - Richard
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
> BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
> <Richard_Noble at Br <mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu 
> <http://own.edu>>
>
>
> John Lancaster <mailto:jjlancaster at me.com>
> January 7, 2017 at 2:55 PM
> I'd suggest that a semi-colon or period should follow Hain - that is, 
> that the Hain reference was not intended to relate to the reading of 
> leaf 2/1r, line 1.
>
> The reading is on the first leaf of the second gathering, at least 
> according to the collation given in Bod-Inc and BSB, and from the 
> digitized BSB copy.
>
> That BSB copy clearly has "spēs" with a final "s", not a variant final 
> form of "m".
>
> So perhaps there were a couple of press-corrections.
>
> But aside from the ambiguous Hain reference, the note would seem 
> likely to be accurate.
>
> John Lancaster
>
>
> Noble, Richard <mailto:richard_noble at brown.edu>
> January 6, 2017 at 12:43 PM
> [Subject designed to facilitate instant deletion by those to whom it 
> means nothing]
>
> I am puzzled by LC's note in its record for Thomas Aquinas,  Sentencia 
> libri de anima (Venice: Renner, 1472):
>
>       Agrees with Hain, differs from Pellechet, p. [21], line 1: LC 
> "spēs", Pellechet "opēs".
>
> Pellechet does indeed quote the first line of that leaf, as a kind of 
> milepost (it's the first leaf of the third gathering), and gives 
> "opes"; but Hain's entry has nothing to say about this leaf at all. I 
> don't know whether this is Pellechet misquoting, or accidentally 
> turning up an isolated press-variant. The correct reading is actually 
>  for the contraction of "speciem"--the final "letter" is not "s" but 
> the variant final form of "m": the passage reads, without 
> contractions, "Unde coacti sunt ponere ideas per quarum 
> participationem et res naturales specium sortiuntur ...").
>
> Is it worth trying to read this cataloger's mind? I'm working with 
> this record at present.
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
> BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
> <Richard_Noble at Br <mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu 
> <http://own.edu>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20170107/958868e5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 364063 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20170107/958868e5/attachment-0001.png>