[DCRM-L] Update on the RBMS Policy Statements to RDA

[Erin Blake]

Quick clarification about manuscripts: the BSR actually does make provision
for manuscripts (starts on page 20), it's just that RBMS doesn't provide
"rare materials" guidance on manuscripts (other than rare cartographic
manuscripts and rare music manuscripts, through their respective DCRM
modules).

Erin.


----------------
Erin Blake, PhD  |  pronouns: she/her/hers  |  Senior Cataloger  |  Folger
Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC, 20003  |
eblake at folger.edu  |  www.folger.edu



On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 2:21 PM Mascaro, Michelle <mmascaro at ucsd.edu> wrote:

> At ALA Annual 2019, the RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee had
> several discussions regarding what tools and guidance the rare materials
> cataloging community needs in order to catalog rare materials in
> conjunction with the new RDA.  The conclusion of the discussions was that
> in depth guidance that rare materials catalogers rely on in the current
> Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (DCRM) manuals cannot effectively
> be reproduced by policy statements in the Beta Toolkit alone and a change
> of approach was necessary.  The RBMS Policy Statements Editorial Group (a
> “subgroup” of the Bibliographic Standards Committee) has been renamed the
> RBMS RDA Editorial Group and charged with developing guidance and tools for
> cataloging rare materials according to RDA as needed by the community.
>
> The editorial group will revise the current DCRM manuals (starting with
> Books) to be RDA compliant and align with the RDA Element Set.  (Language
> in the revised manual will be heavily based on the current manuals.)  The
> new manual will be published as a free online resource outside the
> Toolkit.  Like the RDA Toolkit (and the 2002 revision of AACR2), the
> revised DCRM manuals will be considered an integrating resources and
> updates incorporated as needed.
>
> The editorial group will also create a set of policy statements for
> publication within the Toolkit.  The policy statements will be short and
> concise and link to the revised DCRM Manual for fuller
> instructions/guidance. (For example, apply this option; see DCRM X.X for
> additional guidance.)
>
> Until the new guidelines are complete, rare materials catalogers, who wish
> to create RDA-acceptable DCRM records, should follow provisions for rare
> materials included in the RDA BIBCO Standard Record (BSR)
> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.loc.gov%2Faba%2Fpcc%2Fbibco%2Fdocuments%2FPCC-RDA-BSR.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cefh7%40psu.edu%7C4c7df33d6b6440bf274308d707107e7c%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C1%7C636985640257471681&sdata=nHOf1WqJc7OieKr%2BcTD8vQa8x%2FhU8aGti19jSI54%2BkA%3D&reserved=0>.
> See the BSC statement on DCRM and RDA
> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frbms.info%2Fdcrm%2Frda%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cefh7%40psu.edu%7C4c7df33d6b6440bf274308d707107e7c%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C1%7C636985640257481674&sdata=5NDOlx1%2FflXo8U9qBfNuzTtRG94WYvlUaBtSW6yjSCA%3D&reserved=0>
> for additional details.  As there are no manuscript provisions in the BSR,
> manuscript catalogers should continue to catalog according to DCRM(MSS),
> using RDA guidelines for access points.
>
> Best,
>
> Elizabeth Hobart and Michelle Mascaro, RBMS RDA Editorial Group, co-editors
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20190722/fddd8ba0/attachment-0001.html>