[DCRM-L] Author's Name in a Dutch and Latin Statement of Responsibility
Robert Maxwell
robert_maxwell at byu.edu
Fri Nov 18 09:29:26 MST 2022
Since "Antonii Eygel" appears in the context of Dutch text, and as you say there doesn't seem to be any reason for genitive (and in fact, his title "medicinae doctor" is nominative), I'd say the preferred name is Antonii Eygel, AAP "Eygel, Antonii"; I wouldn't extrapolate a nominative form "Antonius" as a variant, either.
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Apologema_pro_urinis_humanis_of_Verantwo/HjxmAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
I notice that this contemporary report of the work renders his name "Antonii Eygel"
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Philosophical_Transactions_of_the_Royal/DNReAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Antonii+Eygel%22&pg=PA1038&printsec=frontcover
Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Cataloger
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568
"We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves to the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.
From: DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> On Behalf Of Rebecca Flore
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 9:05 AM
To: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: [DCRM-L] Author's Name in a Dutch and Latin Statement of Responsibility
Hi all,
I'm looking for some input on how to establish a name authority record for an author whose name is given in the statement of responsibility as what appears to be a combination of Latin and Dutch (in a book published in 1672). The statement of responsibility on the title page is "alle beschreven door Antonii Eygel, medicinae doctor." The National Library of the Netherlands' established form of the name is "Eygel, Antonius."
Is "Antonii" functioning as a Latin genitive (why genitive here?) and I should record the name as "Eygel, Antonius" in the 100 1_ of the name authority record? If so, should I record "Eygel, Antonii" as a 400 1_ for the name as it appears on the title page?
Or is this a Dutch nominative that I should record as 100 1_ Eygel, Antonii with 400 1_ Eygel Antonius referencing the Dutch authority record?
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Best wishes,
Rebecca
Rebecca Flore
Special Collections Metadata Librarian
The Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center
University of Chicago Library
rflore at uchicago.edu<mailto:rflore at uchicago.edu>
773-702-7602
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20221118/fbe484d8/attachment.htm>
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list