[DCRM-L] Bound-with or published together?

[Ruth Ellen St. Onge]

Good afternoon,

Personally, I would treat it as a bound-with and create records for each of
the works. The sammelbands I have been cataloguing recently are often
compilations of pamphlets and short works printed and/or published
separately but written in response to an ongoing debate. This example is
also cool because the fourth work is printed by the widow of the printer
Meyer. My guess is that there are no existing records, or only bare-bones
records for some of the works, because they are relatively obscure.
However, I could be wrong!

Good luck!

Ruth-Ellen

*Ruth-Ellen St. Onge*, MISt, PhD
(She/Her/They)

Distinctive Collections Cataloguing Librarian

Archives and Research Collections
McMaster University Library

 stongr2 at mcmaster.ca

*McMaster University recognizes and acknowledges that it is located on the
traditional territories of the Mississauga and Haudenosaunee nations, and
within the lands protected by the Dish With One Spoon wampum agreement.*




On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 15:34, Tess Amram via DCRM-L <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
wrote:

> Hello, fellow catalogers!
>
>
>
> I have a bit of a mystery of an item on my hands, and I can’t tell whether
> to treat it as a bound-with or a single work. Let me explain:
>
>
>
> The first work in this item is Jacob Friedrich Reimmann’s * Historia
> universalis atheism et atheorum…*, with a publication date of 1725. All
> the records in OCLC that I can find specify that this was published
> together with Reimmann’s *Idea compendii theologici…*, published 1724,
> added at the end. However, the copy I have in hand has a 1725 edition of
> the *Idea compendia theologici…*, and it’s bound in at the beginning,
> after the first [32] pages of the *Historia*, which picks up again after
> the *Idea compendii.* At the end of the text of the *Historia*, there is
> a corrigenda leaf that I can find no mention of in any existing record.
>
>
>
> Complicating matters is that there are two other works also bound into
> this item. The first is Reimmann’s *Diatribe anti-critica*, published
> 1726, followed by a work titled *Vindiciae nominis Buddeani contra
> obtrectationes nuperas Iac. Frid. Reimmanni*, also dated 1726, which OCLC
> tells me is attributed to Johann Heinrich Kromayer. From what I can tell,
> these latter two are volleys in an ongoing debate between Reimmann and
> Kromayer about Johann Franz Buddeus. There’s no English copy for the
> *Vindiciae*, and only one bare-bones English record for the *Diatribe*
> that I can find, which makes me unsure if these were published individually.
>
>
>
> Basically, I’m unsure if I should treat this item as one single published
> item with four related works in it, or as four works in a bound-with. I’ve
> attached pictures of the title pages of the four works in question. Can
> anyone shed any light on the situation?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tess Amram (they/them)
>
> Special Materials and Continuing Resources Cataloging Librarian, Teaching
> Assistant Professor
>
> Resource Description Services Team
>
> N110J University Libraries
>
> University of Colorado Boulder
>
> Boulder, Colorado 80309
>
> Email: Tess.Amram at colorado.edu
>
> Phone: 303-492-1492
>
>
> --------------------
> You have received this message because you are a subscriber to the DCRM-L
> discussion list.
>
> You can change the email associated with your subscription, the method
> that you receive DCRM-L posts, unsubscribe, and other settings by logging
> into your subscription at
> https://listserver.lib.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/dcrm-l.
>
> Alternately, to unsubscribe from this list send a message to
> dcrm-l-leave at lib.byu.edu. You will receive an email requesting
> confirmation of your request.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20240719/f34a149d/attachment.htm>