[DCRB-L] MARC format change proposal: repeatability of 260 $e,f,g

[lcreider at lib.nmsu.edu]

John,
   Before you send the proposal forward, one more typo: 10. "Miniscule" should 
be "Minuscule," I believe. 
   One thing I worry about is the impact that this might have on catalogers 
using AACR2.  Will people take advantage of the format, and is this a problem?  
On the other hand, I could see how catalogers of visual materials might find it 
useful.
     Larry Creider

Quoting John Attig <jxa16 at psulias.psu.edu>:

> 
> I'll make that change. I've heard no other comments.  Do you want to have 
> the Committee vote or should I just send it forward?
> 
>          John
> 
> At 10:17 AM 8/9/2003, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:
> >John, this looks very good. I have no suggestions to make, except to point
> 
> >out a typo in the answer to question #2: Catalogingof
> 
>