[DCRB-L] Repeatability of printing information

[John Attig]

At the DCRM Conference, it was indicated that field 260 subfields $e, f, g 
(Place of printing, name of printer, date of printing) would need to be 
made repeatable in order to accommodate nineteenth-century books.  I 
volunteered to draft a MARC format revision proposal.

Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any examples that would require 
repeating these subfields, either in DCRB or in ISBD(A).  If anybody has 
any such examples, I would be delighted to have them.

	John Attig
	Cataloging Services
	Penn State University Libraries
	jxa16 at psulias.psu.edu