[DCRM-L] imperfect copies

[Will Evans]

I find Stephen's example to be the clearest yet. 

 

Will.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Stephen Skuce
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:53 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List; DCRM-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] imperfect copies

 

I think breaking up the long second sentence helps.


0B2. Imperfect copies. In general, base the description on the copy in hand.
If this copy is known to be imperfect, however, and details of a copy
without the imperfection(s) can be determined, base the description on the
copy without the imperfection(s).  Use brackets only where required for
description of the perfect copy.

Stephen
At 11:57 AM 4/5/2006 -0400, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:




Dear colleagues,

Im not sure the instructions for cataloging an imperfect item when a
description for a perfect item is available are clear. 

0B2. Imperfect copies. In general, base the description on the copy in hand.
If this copy is known to be imperfect, however, and details of a copy
without the imperfection(s) can be determined, base the description on the
copy without the imperfection(s), bracketing only as description of the
perfect copy would require.

Is this clear? Is there a better way of saying it?

__________________________________________

Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.

Chair, RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee

http://www.folger.edu/bsc/index.html

Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library

201 East Capitol St., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20003

djleslie at folger.edu || 202.675-0369

http://www.folger.edu

| Stephen Skuce  |  Rare Books Cataloging Librarian     
| MIT Libraries  |  Building 14E-210B  |  617.253.0654 |  skuce at mit.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20060405/eaa1ad7d/attachment.htm