[DCRM-L] imperfect copies

[Ann W. Copeland]

I also prefer Stephen's version. Annie

At 01:07 PM 4/5/2006, you wrote:
>I find Stephen's example to be the clearest yet.
>
>Will.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On 
>Behalf Of Stephen Skuce
>Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:53 PM
>To: DCRM Revision Group List; DCRM-l at lib.byu.edu
>Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] imperfect copies
>
>I think breaking up the long second sentence helps.
>
>
>0B2. Imperfect copies. In general, base the description on the copy in 
>hand. If this copy is known to be imperfect, however, and details of a 
>copy without the imperfection(s) can be determined, base the description 
>on the copy without the imperfection(s).  Use brackets only where required 
>for description of the perfect copy.
>
>Stephen
>At 11:57 AM 4/5/2006 -0400, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20060405/89081103/attachment.htm