[DCRM-L] DCRB Core

[Beth Russell]

Because it's essential to the character of the item. I guess in my 
mind, it's equivalent to "microfilm" or "photocopy" in a 533, 
although of course the designation of the institution and year is a 
bit more detailed.

And we often have (in university archives) multiple manuscript drafts 
of things like research papers, and it's helpful to have in the 
bibliographic record that a particular record represents the final, 
version submitted to the institution.

Maybe I'm having problems with the "core" concept, since I have never 
used it except for PCC records for new fiction.

Beth


At 01:19 PM 3/1/2006, you wrote:
>In doing full cataloging (which is all I do), I would of course make
>this note. But why do you think it's essential for core level?
>
>________________________
>Deborah J. Leslie
>Folger Library
>djleslie at folger.edu
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
>Behalf Of Beth Russell
>Sent: Wednesday, 01 March, 2006 12:45
>To: DCRM Revision Group List
>Subject: RE: [DCRM-L] DCRB Core
>
>
>Am I missing something? I think it's pretty essential to identify a
>dissertation as such. I would never even consider NOT including this
>note. I'm GLAD it's MA, personally.
>
>Beth

----------------------
Beth M. Russell
Associate Professor
Head, Special Collections Cataloging
The Ohio State University Libraries
1858 Neil Avenue Mall
Columbus OH 43210-1286
614-247-7463
FAX 614-292-2015
russell.363 at osu.edu
----------------------