[DCRM-L] cum pruilegio

[Karen.Attar at london.ac.uk]

Dear Deborah,
DCRB or DCRM(B)? I don't have a draft of DCRM(B) with me, but in DCRB
it's in 1A2, "Sources of information": "Omit, without using the mark of
omission, information found on the title page that constitutes neither
title informmation nor a statement of responsibility. Such information
may include pious invocations, devices, announcements, epigrams,
dedications, mottoes, statements of patronage, prices, etc." 
I hope this isn't too late to be of use,
Karen

Dr Karen Attar
Rare Books Librarian
Senate House Library
University of London 
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU 
Tel. 020 7862 8477


-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: 13 February 2007 03:37
To: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: [DCRM-L] cum pruilegio

Another emergency question. It's probably a huge mental lapse, but now I
can't find anything that says we shouldn't transcribe privilege
statements. I know it's been general practice to silently omit them, but
where does it say that?
 
Trying not to panic in Wellington.
 
__________________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
Head of Cataloging
Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., S.E.
Washington, DC 20003
202.675-0369
djleslie at folger.edu