[DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement

[John Lancaster]

Watermark evidence might help, at least to rule out some possibilities.
 
If you could tell us what the work is, perhaps someone with another copy could help.

________________________________

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu on behalf of silvanan at mptek.net
Sent: Tue 11/24/2009 2:43 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement



Hard to tell. It's a pretty thick folio and the gathering sewing isn't
really visible.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> From: "John Lancaster" <jlancaster at amherst.edu>
> Date: Tue, November 24, 2009 2:25 pm
> To: "DCRM Revision Group List" <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
> Is this a single gathering of 10 leaves?  If so, I would record it as [par.]^10 with a statement of the actual signings. (^10 = superscript 10; this e-mail system does not offer superscripts)
> ________________________________
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu on behalf of silvanan at mptek.net
> Sent: Tue 11/24/2009 2:08 PM
> To: EXLIBRIS-L at LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU; DCRM-L
> Subject: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> Hi there,
> What would be the best way to notate the following prelim. sequence:
> 1st leaf (t.p.) unsigned, [par.], [par.]1, [par.]2, [par.]3 [par.]4,
> [par.]5, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf
> followed by A, A2 ... etc.   
> Thanks,
> Silvana



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4281 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20091124/0bb6f2d2/attachment.bin