[DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement

[silvanan at mptek.net]

Stow, John
The annales, or Generall chronicle of England
Londini : Impensis Thomae Adams,1615 

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> From: "John Lancaster" <jlancaster at amherst.edu>
> Date: Tue, November 24, 2009 2:49 pm
> To: "DCRM Revision Group List" <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
> Watermark evidence might help, at least to rule out some possibilities.
>  
> If you could tell us what the work is, perhaps someone with another copy could help.
> ________________________________
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu on behalf of silvanan at mptek.net
> Sent: Tue 11/24/2009 2:43 PM
> To: DCRM Revision Group List
> Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> Hard to tell. It's a pretty thick folio and the gathering sewing isn't
> really visible.
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> > From: "John Lancaster" <jlancaster at amherst.edu>
> > Date: Tue, November 24, 2009 2:25 pm
> > To: "DCRM Revision Group List" <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
> > Is this a single gathering of 10 leaves?  If so, I would record it as [par.]^10 with a statement of the actual signings. (^10 = superscript 10; this e-mail system does not offer superscripts)
> > ________________________________
> > From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu on behalf of silvanan at mptek.net
> > Sent: Tue 11/24/2009 2:08 PM
> > To: EXLIBRIS-L at LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU; DCRM-L
> > Subject: [DCRM-L] Suggestions for odd signature statement
> > Hi there,
> > What would be the best way to notate the following prelim. sequence:
> > 1st leaf (t.p.) unsigned, [par.], [par.]1, [par.]2, [par.]3 [par.]4,
> > [par.]5, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf, unsigned leaf
> > followed by A, A2 ... etc.   
> > Thanks,
> > Silvana