[DCRM-L] Cataloging of single leaves

[Ryan]

One thing I like about this approach is that it allows other libraries to
use the record, collocating leaves around the world. Would other catalogers
feel comfortable adding holdings to a record like this? Or would you derive
your own? -Ryan


--
Ryan Hildebrand
Book Cataloging Dept. Head
Harry Ransom Center
University of Texas at Austin
P.O. Box 7219
Austin, TX 78713-7219
512-232-1681
www.hrc.utexas.edu





-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Lenore Rouse
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:17 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Cataloging of single leaves

I have wrestled with this problem on several occasions and wished there 
was more guidance in the rules. I do think it is important to state at 
the outset that you have a fragment of some sort. When I looked at how 
other catalogers dealt with the problem, I found considerable variation, 
so pretty much comped together my own standard, with a 
cataloger-supplied title of [Detached leaf of....].  See OCLC 297529215 
for an example. I guess the question is knowing how to draw a line 
between a record for a fragment and a record for a whole which is 
imperfect.

best
Lenore
 



-- 
Lenore M. Rouse
Curator, Rare Books & Special Collections
Adjunct Professor, School of Library and Information Science
The Catholic University of America
Room 214, Mullen Library
620 Michigan Avenue N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20064

PHONE: 202 319-5090
E-MAIL: rouse at cua.edu