[DCRM-L] Cataloging of single leaves

Tue Apr 6 16:06:52 MDT 2010

I was just heading towards the concept of 

245 $a Main title. $h [Fragment] when Dick Miller's e-mail arrived, which is
simply how I would have dealt with it in the absence of finding a rule, and
supposing I could identify the title from the fragment anyway.

Jane

Mrs J.V.S. Wickenden

Historic Collections Library 

Institute of Naval Medicine

Alverstoke

Gosport

Hants PO12 2DL

  _____  

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Dick Miller
Sent: 6 April 2010 20.43
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Cataloging of single leaves

Have you considered a uniform title with $k Fragments ? Not sure about
current practice. Dick

At 09:39 AM 4/6/2010, you wrote:

Has anyone approached the cataloging of an individual leaf (or leaves) in a
manner in which the physical description reflects only what you have (vs.
DCRM(B) 5B1.1)? The question is prompted by a loan request in which the
requester did not realize that our "copy" was merely two leaves of a
publication. This information is stated in a local note, but one of our
public services librarians feels that this is not a very user friendly way
of saying we have only two leaves. 

Thanks,
Ryan

--
Ryan Hildebrand
Book Cataloging Dept. Head
Harry Ransom Center
University of Texas at Austin
P.O. Box 7219
Austin, TX 78713-7219
512-232-1681
www.hrc.utexas.edu <http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/> 

Dick R. Miller
Director for Resource Management
Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center 
Information Resources & Technology (IRT)
Stanford University Medical Center 
300 Pasteur Drive, L109, Stanford, CA 94305-5123
dick at stanford.edu
650.725.4615 (phone)  650.725-7471 (fax)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20100406/2e145b00/attachment.htm 